期刊文献+

人文关怀视野下的读者个人信息人格权研究 被引量:3

A Study on the Right of Readers' Personal Information in the View of Humanistic Concern
下载PDF
导出
摘要 个人信息承载着读者尊严与自由等人格价值,对它的保护则是图书馆对读者进行人文关怀的重要体现。但在网络环境下个人信息时常被他人任意处理,这既阻碍了读者人格价值的实现,又降低了图书馆对读者人性化服务的质量。文章立足于我国图书馆信息管理与数字化建设的实情,通过价值思辨、借鉴美欧经验并研判国内学说,建议设定人格权保护读者个人信息,以此促使图书馆等信息处理者关怀读者的人格,进而应对网络时代图书馆发展所面临的挑战。在构造人格权时,立法者宜按照读者人格尊严与人格自由的不同价值尺度设定对应的权利行使规则,以实现对两种价值的具体关怀;同时为满足图书馆优化信息管理等需求,限制部分规则的适用。 The personal information carries with the personality value such as reader dignity and freedom that the embodiment of its protection is library humanistic concern to reader. Under network environment others can make free with personal information that hinder realization of reader personality value and lower quality of library humanistic service for readers. Based on information management and digitalization construction this paper suggests legislators establish specific rights relevant to these values by value analysis and in the light of legislative experiences of EU and U.S as well as domestic views.The personality right be established pertaining readers' personality value, and relative rules of the right be set pursuant to value criterion of readers' personal dignity and freedom, the right of utilization pertaining the promotion of information utilization be established for the sake of users like the library. The personality right should be given the priority to the right of utilization, and the latter should be authorized by the former.
作者 李仪 张娟
出处 《图书馆》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期7-10,23,共5页 Library
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"网络环境下个人信息安全危机与法律规制对策研究"(项目编号:12XFX021) 重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究重点项目"网络环境下个人信息保护困境的法律应对"(项目编号:14SKL01)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 读者个人信息 人文关怀 人格尊严 人格自由 个人信息人格权 Readers’ personal information Humanistic concern Personal dignity Personal freedom Personality right of personal information
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Jo Bryce,James Fraser.The role of disclosure of personal information in the evaluation of risk and trust in young peoples’online interactions.Computers in Human Behavior,2014(1):34-38.
  • 2周毅.以信息权利保护为中心的信息立法价值导向探讨——对我国信息立法若干文本的初步解读[J].中国图书馆学报,2010,36(1):93-99. 被引量:12
  • 3WIPO.Draft WIPO Treaty on exceptions and limitations for the persons with disabilities,educational and research institutions,libraries and archives(Proposal by the African Group).[2013-07-19 ].http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_22/sccr_22_12.pdf.
  • 4WIPO.Working document containing comments on and textual suggestions towards an appropriate international legal instrument(in whatever form)on exceptions and limitations for libraries and archives.[2013-07-27].http://www.Wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_23/sccr_23_8.pdf.
  • 5Personal Data Protection in Europe and China:What lessons can be learned.EU-China Information Society Project.[2014-4-11].http://www.doc88.com/p-77743634837.html.
  • 6Michael Madow,Private Ownership of Public Image:Popular culture and Publicity Rights.Law Review,1993(4):115-117.
  • 7G.W.F Hegel.Hegel’s Philosophy of Right.Books Kitchener,2001:42-46.
  • 8《图书情报工作》杂志社.新环境下图书馆服务与资源开发.北京:海洋出版社,207-211.
  • 9I.Fisher.Elementary Principle of Economics.Macmilian,1923:27-30.
  • 10(美)约翰·罗尔斯 何怀宏译.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.P302.

二级参考文献18

共引文献48

同被引文献47

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部