区调扇区和进近扇区复杂度对比研究

Complexity Comparison of Aero Control Sector with Approach Sector

随着空中交通流量的增加,空中交通管制面临着严峻挑战,表现在进近与区调扇区间管制协调的矛盾日益突出。对比国内某管制区进近扇区和区调扇区的管制复杂度能更好地协调进近扇区和区调扇区的空中交通管制工作负荷,均衡进近扇区和区调扇区的管制复杂度,达到提高扇区容量的目的。为科学合理地对比扇区管制复杂度,构建了扇区静态复杂度对比的指标及其量化方法,并设计了静态复杂度对比实验来对比进近扇区与区调扇区的静态复杂度。另采用"管制扇区空域复杂性分析系统"软件,以厦门高崎国际机场为例,根据真实雷达管制数据,通过实验,分析对比了进近扇区与区调扇区的动态复杂度。通过分析实验结果,发现进近扇区管制比区调扇区管制复杂度更大更难。为达到均衡工作负荷、提高空中交通流量、减轻管制员负荷的目的,对现有的进近扇区和区调扇区的管制方法和空域结构提出了一些合理化建议。

Along with the increasing air traffic flow,ATC（ air traffic control） is facing severe challenges which is the increasingly prominent contradictions of control coordination between approach（ APP） and aero control（ ACC） sectors. It provides a better way for APP and ACC to balance air traffic control workload and control complexity by comparing the complexity of the two sectors. Comparison index and its quantification method were constructed and an experiment was dsigned to compare the static complexity of APP and ACC sectors. In addition,dynamic complexity of APP and ACC sector is compared by utilizing the software of ＂Air Traffic Control Sector Complexity Analyzing System＂according to the real radar control data of Xiamen airport. Consequently,APP complexity is much higher than ACC. Reasonable suggestions are put forward aiming at improving current control method and airspace structure in APP and ACC sector in order to balance workload and improve the capacity of the sector.