期刊文献+

乳腺导管内癌微浸润癌分子生物标志物的表达及其与超声表现的相关性 被引量:3

Expressions of biomarkers in breast ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS) and DCIS with microinvasion(DCIS-Mi)and their relationship with sonographic features
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨乳腺导管内癌(ductal carcinoma in situ,DCIS)与导管内癌伴微浸润(ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion,DCIS-Mi)间的分子生物学表达差异,并分析其与超声征象间的相关性。方法:回顾性分析199例DCIS患者的术前完整超声影像资料及可供分析的雌激素受体、孕激素受体、人表皮生长因子受体2(human epidermal growth factor receptor 2,HER2)、Ki-67指数等免疫组织化学指标,比较2组间分子生物学表达的差异,并探讨其与患者超声表现间的相关性。结果:199例患者中,DCIS为123例(61.8%),DCIS-Mi为76例(38.2%)。DCIS组与DCIS-Mi组间的雌激素受体、孕激素受体表达无统计学差异(P>0.05),而DCIS-Mi组的HER2阳性率及Ki-67指数均高于DCIS组(P<0.05)。2组病灶的各超声征象中,微钙化的存在与HER2阳性表达相关,而肿块的最大径及Adler血供分级与Ki-67指数高表达相关(P<0.05)。结论:DCIS-Mi患者较DCIS患者在分子生物学表达方面预后更差,而部分超声征象与DCIS及DCIS-Mi预后差的分子生物学表达间存在相关性。 Objectives: To study the differences between expressions of biomarkers in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and in breast DCIS with mieroinvasion (DCIS-Mi) and analyze their correlation with sonographie features. Methods: A total of 199 patients with comprehensive data were enrolled. Biomarkers including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and Ki-67 index, as well as preoperative ultrasonographic imaging data were analyzed retrospectively. Differences in expressions of biomarkers mentioned above between DCIS and DCIS-Mi were analyzed. Correlations of expressions of biomarkers with sonographic features were evalua-ted. Results: Pathologic results demonstrated 123 cases of DCIS and 76 cases of DCIS-Mi. There was no significant difference in ER, PR expression between DCIS and DCIS-Mi (P〉0.05). DCIS-Mi had a higher positive expression rate of HER2 and a higher expression of Ki-67 index than those in DCIS (P〈0.05). Furthermore, presence of microealcifieation on sonographie features had correlation with HER2 positive expression, while larger tumor size and higher Adler grade of blood flow had significant correlation with high Ki-67 expression (P〈0.05). Conclusions: Compared with DCIS, DCIS-Mi has more biomarkers of poor prognosis, and some sonographic features are associated with these biomarkers.
出处 《诊断学理论与实践》 2014年第6期588-592,共5页 Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice
关键词 乳腺导管内癌 微浸润癌 生物标志物 超声 Breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ Microinvasion Biomarkers Sonography
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1de Mascarel I, MacGrogan G, Mathoulin-P61issier S, et al. Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion: a definition supported by a long-term study of 1248 serially sectioned ductal carcinomas[J]. Cancer,2002,;94(8):2134- 2142.
  • 2Brinton LA, Sherman ME, Carreon JD, et al. Recent trendsin breast cancer among younger women in the United States[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,2008,100(22):1643-1648.
  • 3Wiechmann L, Kuerer HM. The molecular journey from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer[J]. Cancer,2008,112(10):2130-2142.
  • 4Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultra- sound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings[J]. Ultrasound Med Bio1,1990,16(6): 553-559.
  • 5Penauh-Llorca 17, Andr6 F, Sagan C, et al. Ki67 expres- sion and doeetaxel efficacy in patients with estrogen re- ceptor-positive breast cancer[J]. J Clin 0ncol,2009,27(17): 2809-1285.
  • 6Rauch GM, Kuerer HM, Scoggins ME, et al. Clinico- pathologic, mammographic, and sonographic features in 1,187 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by estrogen receptor status[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2013,139(3): 639 -647.
  • 7Liao N, Zhang GC, Liu YH, et al. HER2-positive status isan independent predictor for coexisting invasion of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast presenting extensive DCIS component[J]. Pathol Res Pract,2011,207(1):1-7.
  • 8Zhang W, Gao EL, Zhou YL, et al. Different distribution of breast ductal carcinoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion, and invasion breast cancer[J]. World J Surg 0ncol,2012,10:262.
  • 9Okumura Y, Yamamoto Y, Zhang Z, et al. Identification of biomarkers in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with microinvasion[J]. BMC Cancer,2008,8:287.
  • 10姚洁洁,张静雯,詹维伟,费晓春.乳腺导管内癌及其微浸润癌的临床、病理及超声特征[J].中国医学影像技术,2013,29(9):1460-1464. 被引量:10

二级参考文献15

  • 1Brinton LA, Sherman ME, Carreon JD, et al. Recent trends in breast Cancer among younger women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2008,100(22):1643-1648.
  • 2Bijker N, Donker M, Wesseling J, et al. Is DCIS breast cancer, and how do I treat it? Curr Treat Options Oncol, 2013,14(1):75-87.
  • 3Wiechmann L, Kuerer HM. The molecular journey from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer. Cancer, 2008,112(10):2130-2142.
  • 4Cavaliere A, Scheibel M, Bellezza G, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion: Clinicopathologic study and biopathologic profile. Pathol Res Pract, 2006,202(3):131-135.
  • 5Osako T, Iwase T, Kimura K, et al. Detection of occult invasion in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with sentinel node metastasis. Cancer Sci, 2013,104(4):453-457.
  • 6Ansari B, Boughey JC, Adamczyk DL, et al. Should axillary ultrasound be used in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ? Am J Surg, 2012,204(3):290-293.
  • 7Adamovich TL, Simmons RM. Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. Am J Surg, 2003,186(2):112-116.
  • 8Tunon-de-Lara C, André G, Macgrogan G, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Influence of age on diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic features. Retrospective study of 812 patients. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011,18(5):1372-1379.
  • 9Cunha PO, Ornstein M, Jones JL. Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ from the pathological perspective. Breast Care (Basel), 2010,5(4):233-239.
  • 10Bane A. Ductal carcinoma in situ: What the pathologist needs to know and why. Int J Breast Cancer, 2013,2013:914053.

共引文献9

同被引文献11

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部