期刊文献+

Embodied Energy and CO2 Associated with Buildings by Using Input and Output Table in Japan

Embodied Energy and CO2 Associated with Buildings by Using Input and Output Table in Japan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In July 2009, the 2005 basic Japanese input/output table was publicized together with its physical transaction table. This research paper analyzed the 2005 IO (input/output) table to create building industry-related intensities and, at the same time, compared the building industry with industries at large for distribution margins and transportation. The analysis of distribution margins separately for middle and purchaser margins found that middle margins in the building industry are minor at 35% of the averages for all industries, while purchaser margins are sizable at 1.8 times, proving that it is an industry for which local production for local consumption is quite effective. CO2 emissions resulting from transportation in the building industry were calculated and concisely characterized. Although the ratio of transportation CO2 emissions to total CO2 emissions in each industry finds almost no difference between general industries and the building industry, transportation CO2 emissions per production value are two to three times heavier than those from general industries to be justified as a transportation-intensive industry.
出处 《Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture》 2015年第2期153-164,共12页 土木工程与建筑(英文版)
关键词 Embodied energy embodied CO2 input and output table. 输入/输出 CO2排放 建筑行业 日本 二氧化碳排放量 利润分配 交通运输 能源
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. 2009. 2005 Input and Output Table. Japan: Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry.
  • 2Kawazu, Y., Yokoo, N., Oka, T., and lshikuro, H. 2008. "A Study on the Transition of Materials about the Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission Associated with Building Construction." Journal of Environmental Engineering 73 (629): 931-38.
  • 3Yokoyama, K., Yokoo, N., and Oka, T. 2005. "Energy/CO2 Intensities Based on 2000 Input/Output Table and Evaluation of Building." Journal of Environmental Engineering 589: 75-82.
  • 4Imada, K., Nomura, Y., Ishikawa, T., Noda, C., and Hisaki, A. 2004. "Survey on Calculation of Environmental Burden of Wooden Houses Partl: Review of the Past Studies on Calculation Method." In Proceedings of Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ (Architectural lnstitute of Japan), 1211-2.
  • 5Ikaga, T., Tsuda, K., Murakami, S., Kuma, K., Hondo, Y., and Narita, W. 2006. "Study on Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Buildings (Part 2), Comparison of Environmental Impact of Local Woods and Imported Woods." In Proceedings of Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, 985-6.
  • 6Amano, K., Ito, M., Ikeda, K., and Yanagisawa, Y. 1996. "Gross Resource Consumption in Relation to Cement and Concrete." Environmental Systems Research 24: 425-9.
  • 7Yamabe, Y., Tani, A., and Kawamura, H. 2008. "Simulation of a Reccurent Architecture Network Based Circulation Society." Journal of Environmental Engineering 73 (624): 253-60.
  • 8Cole, R. J. 1999. "Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with the Construction of Alternative Structural Systems." Building and Environment 34 (3): 335-48.
  • 9Cole, R. J., and Kerman, P. C. 1996. "Life-Cycle Energy Use in Office Building." Building and Environment 31 (4): 307-17.
  • 10Lenzen, M., and Treloar, G. 2002. "Embodied Energy in Buildings: Wood Versus Concrete." Energy Policy 30 (3):249-55.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部