期刊文献+

GnRH-a对子宫内膜非典型增生的治疗价值 被引量:15

The value of GnRH- a in treatment of endometrial atypical hyperplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨GnRH-a在子宫内膜非典型增生(AEH)中的治疗价值。方法:将66例子宫内膜非典型增生患者按照随机的原则分为2组,A组患者(32例)使用GnRH-a(诺雷德)治疗,每月一次,连用6个月。B组患者(34例)使用孕激素(醋酸甲羟孕酮)连续治疗6个月。每3个月行宫腔镜检查,并行内膜活检,记录结果并进行统计学分析。结果:两组轻中度非典型性增生治疗效果,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。重度非典型增生治疗效果GnRH-a组低于孕激素组,P<0.05,有统计学意义。两组总的治疗效果比较,无统学意义(P>0.05)。结论:GnRH-a用于治疗子宫内膜非典型增生效果与醋酸甲羟孕酮相似,具有每月一次的方便性,但价格较贵。 Objective:To investigate the value of GnRH - a in the treatment of endometrial atypical hyperplasia (AEH). Methods:All 66 cases of endometrial atypical hyperplasia patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. The patients in group A(32 cases)were treated with GnRH - a for 6 months. Patients in group B(34 cases)were treated with progesterone therapy for 6 months. Hysteroscopy examination and endometrial biopsy were applied every three months. Results:Among the patients with mild to moderate atypical hyperplasia,there was no statistical difference in the therapeutic effect between the two groups(P &gt; 0. 05),while GnRH - a was not as effective as progesterone in the treatment of severe endometrial atypical hyperplasia(P 〈 0. 05). There was no statistical difference between the thera-peutic effect of the two groups overall(P〉 0. 05). Conclusion:The therapeutic effect of GnRH - a was similar to that of medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of endometrial atypical hyperplasia.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2015年第5期686-688,共3页 Journal of Modern Oncology
基金 辽宁省科技厅资助项目(编号:2013225079)
关键词 醋酸甲羟孕酮 子宫内膜 不典型增生 GNRH - a medroxyprogesterone acetate endometrium atypical hyperplasia GnRH - a
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献56

共引文献56

同被引文献151

  • 1刘玉环,夏恩兰,曲静,黄晓武,郑杰,于丹,彭雪冰.子宫内膜非典型性增生的手术疗效探讨[J].中国内镜杂志,2006,12(8):812-814. 被引量:19
  • 2金巧凤,赖爱鸾,张李松,杜强,冯向东.妇康片治疗子宫内膜单纯性增生的临床分析[J].首都医科大学学报,2007,28(5):652-654. 被引量:8
  • 3杨开选,王超.子宫内膜增生症的病因及相关因素[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(11):645-647. 被引量:15
  • 4吴卫康,赵卫星.病理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:154.
  • 5HIGHAM J M, O'BRIEN P M, SHAW R W. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart [ J 1. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990, 97(8) : 734 -739.
  • 6HELLER D S, MOSQUERA C, GOLDSMITH L T, et al. Body mass index of patients with endometrial hyperplasia: comparison to patients with proliferative endometrium and abnormal bleeding[J]. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2011, 56 (3/4): 110 -112.
  • 7SHERMAN M E. Theories of endometrial carcinogenesis: a multidisciplinary approach [ J ]. Modern Pathology : an Official Journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Ine, 2000, 13(3) : 295 -308.
  • 8GALLOS I D, SHEHMAR M, THANGARATINAM S, et al. Oral progestogens vs levonorgestrel - releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis[ J]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010, 203 ( 6 ) : 547. el -547.10.
  • 9GALLOS I D, KRISHAN P, SHEHMAR M, et al. LNG - IUS versus oral progestogen treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a long- term comparative cohort study [ J ]. Human Reproduction ( Oxford, England), 2013, 28 ( 11 ) : 2966 - 2971.
  • 10ORBO A, VEREIDE A, ARNES M, et al. Levonorgestrel - impregnated intrauterine device as treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a National multicenter randomized trial [ J ]. B JOG : an International Journal of Obstetr/cs and Gynaecology, 2014 (121) : 477 -486.

引证文献15

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部