期刊文献+

中国居民邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯膳食摄入水平及其风险评估 被引量:3

Dietary intake and risk assessment of diethylhexyl phthalate in Chinese populations
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析我国居民食物消费水平及食物中邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)含量,评估我国居民膳食DEHP的暴露水平及其风险。方法于2011.12013年,采用分层整群随机抽样方法,选取中国14个省份的70个城市的140个超市或集贸市场为采样点,共采集22类食物样品6650份。采用气相色谱一质谱联用方法,检测食物中DEHP的含量。利用食物中DEHP平均含量和2002年“中国居民营养与健康状况调查”数据中68959名调查对象的食物消费量,采用简单分布模型计算不同年龄组人群膳食DEHP摄入水平以及不同种类食物对膳食DEHP摄入的贡献率,并与DEHP的每日可耐受摄入量(TDI,50μg·kg^-1·d^-1)比较,进行风险特征描述。结果6650份样品中DEHP含量范围为未检出~43.80mg/kg。膳食DEHP平均摄入量为2.07(95%CI:0.06~4.09)μg·kg^-1·d^-1,占TDI(50μg·kg^-1·d^-1)的4.14%。2~6、7—12、13~17、18~59、≥60岁组膳食DEHP摄入量分别为3.92(95%CI:0.83~7.01)、3.02(95%CI:0.69~5.36)、2.17(95%CI:0.54~3.81)、1.83(95%CI:0.46~3.21)和1.66(95%CI:0.38~2.94)μg·kg^-1·d^-1。全人群高食物消费量人群(P97.5)为4.73μg·kg^-1·d^-1,占TDI(50μg·kg^-1·d^-1)的9.46%。大米、瓜茄果类蔬菜、面粉对DEHP膳食摄入的贡献率分别为28.4%(0.59/2.07)、14.7%(0.30/2.07)、13.2%(0.27/2.07)。结论中国居民膳食DEHP摄入水平低于健康指导值;DEHP暴露风险较低;大米、瓜茄果类蔬菜、面粉是人群DEHP膳食摄入的主要来源。 Objective To assess dietary exposure of diethylhexyl phthalate(DEHP) among Chinese population, including general population, children aged 2 -6 years, adolescent aged 7 - 12, young people aged 13 -17, adults aged 18 -59 years old as well as older people aged 60 and above and its health risk. Methods A total of 6 650 food samples were collected during 2011 to 2013 from 140 local markets of 14 provinces in China, which covered major foods in China. Samples were detected by GC-MS and categorized into 22 food groups. Food consumption data were taken from China National Nutrition and Health Survey performed in 2002 including 68 959 subjects. Mean concentrations of DEHP in food were combined with individual food consumption data to estimate dietary exposure, and food contributors to dietary DEHP intake were also calculated. Then, the exposure was compared with the tolerable daily intake (TDI, 50 μg·kg^-1·d^-1 ) of DEHP. Results DEHP level in foods ( n = 6 650) was in the range of not detected to 43.80 mg/kg. Mean dietary intakes of DEHP in general population was 2. 07 (95% CI: 0. 06 - 4.09) μg·kg^-1·d^-1 ,accounting for 4. 14 percent of TDI(50 μg·kg^-1·d^-1 ). Mean dietary intake for population aged 2 -6,7 - 12,13 - 17,18 - 59 as well as elderly aged 60 and above were 3.92(95% CI: 0. 83 -7.01 ) ,3.02(95% CI:0. 69 - 5.36) ,2. 17(95% CI:0. 54 - 3.81 ), 1.83 (95% CI:0. 46 - 3.21 ) and 1.66(95% CI: 0. 38 - 2. 94) μg·kg^-1·d^-1 respectively. The 97.5 percentile intakes in the general populations was 4. 73 μg·kg^-1·d^-1 , accounting for 9.46% of TDI. Main food sources of DEHP were rice(28.4% (0. 59/2.07) ), melon solanaceous vegetables (14. 7% (0. 30/2. 07) ) and flour ( 13.2% (0. 27/ 2.07) ) for the general population. Conclusion The results suggested that dietary exposure to DEHP among Chinese population was lower than tolerable daily intake of DEHP and there were no health concerns based on generally accepted exposure limits. Rice, melon solanaceous vegetables and flour were main food contributors of DEHP dietary intake for Chinese populations.
出处 《中华预防医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期218-222,共5页 Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81273081)
关键词 二乙基己基邻苯二甲酸 食品污染 膳食 风险评估 Diethylhexyl phthalate Food contamination Diet Risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T21911-2008食品中邻苯二甲酸酯的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
  • 2杨月欣,王光亚,潘兴昌.食物成分表2002[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社.2002:49-74.
  • 3国家食品安全风险评估专家委员会.中国居民反式脂肪酸膳食摄人水平及其风险评估[EB/OL].(2013-06-27)[2014-7-2].http://www.cfsa.net.cn/Article/News.aspx?id=106CBAC2840395AFOE03566F644BFBF39FDD885F48BE76D608A5A3B7C8854848E92113D04EF8F36E.
  • 4刘兆平,李凤琴,贾旭东,等.食品中化学物风险评估原则和方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:187-188.
  • 5隋海霞,张磊,毛伟峰,李建文,刘爱东,刘兆平.毒理学关注阈值方法的建立及其在食品接触材料评估中的应用[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2012,24(2):109-113. 被引量:17

二级参考文献14

  • 1FRAWLEY J P.Scientific evidence and common sense as a basisfor food packaging regulations[J].Food Cosmet Toxicol,1967,5:293-308.
  • 2CRAMER G M,FORD R A,HALL R L,et al.Estimation of toxichazard-a decision tree approach[J].Food Cosmet Toxicol,1978,16(3):255-276.
  • 3MUNRO I C,FORD R A,KENNEPOHL E,et al.Correlation ofstructural class with no-observed effect levels:a proposal forestablishing a threshold of concern[J].Food Chem Toxicol,1996,34:8.
  • 4KROES R,RENWICK A G,CHEESEMAN M A,et al.Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern(TTC):guidance forapplication to substances present at low levels in the diet[J].Food Ch.
  • 5JECFA.Toxicological evaluation of certain food additives andcontaminants.Safety evaluation of flavouring agents:Forty-fourthmeeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on FoodAd.
  • 6EFSA Panel on Food contact materials,Enzymes,Flavorings andProcessing Aids.Guidance on the data required for the riskassessment of flavorings to be used in or on foods[J].EFSA J,2.
  • 7EMEA.European Medicines Agency,Committee for MedicinalProducts for Human Use(CHMP)Guideline on the Limits ofGenotoxic Impurities,CPMP/SWP/5199/02,EMEA/CHMP/QWP/251344/2006[S].Lond.
  • 8EFSA.Applicability of QSAR analysis to the evaluation of thetoxicological relevance of metabolites and degradates of pesticideactive substances for dietary risk assessment[R/OL].[.
  • 9EFSA Scientific Committee.Draft scientific opinion on exploringoptions for providing preliminary advice about possible humanhealth risks based on the concept of Threshold of Toxic.
  • 10European Commission.Joint research centre[R/OL].Varese:European Commission,2011[2011-11-28].http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our_labs/computational_toxicology/qsar_tools/toxtree.

共引文献26

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部