期刊文献+

认知专注与团队学习对个体学习影响的实证分析:以管理培训为例

The Empirical Research on Influence of Cognitive Absorption and Group Learning Behavior on Individual Learning:Taking Management Training for Example
原文传递
导出
摘要 管理培训日渐青睐于采用一种强调学员积极参与的培训手段,在这样的背景下,人们愈发想知道学员在培训中的个体投入程度对自身学习有何影响。本文用认知专注来形容一种全神贯注的状态,而这正是在管理培训中学员应达到的理想状态。专注所带来的优势在一些研究中已经得到认可和重视,而本文则着眼于其缺点。文章通过对来自38个团队的190位人员进行跨层次研究,发现认知专注对培训学员的学习行为起到"倒U型"作用。此外,团队学习行为跨层次地影响着认知专注与个体学习之间的关系,并缓解认知专注产生的负面效应。 There is a management training approach,which gains more and more interest and focus because it emphasizes the active involvement of participants. Under such circumstances,people are wondering how individual engagement in the training experience affects managers' individual learning. This research identifies cognitive absorption as the construct that describes the state of full engagement and immersion. While some research has emphasized the positive effect of absorption,this paper focus on the drawbacks of this individual state. This paper tests cross-level model on 190 individuals embedded in 38 groups. The results show that(1) cognitive absorption presents an inverted U-shape effect in predicting individual learning; and(2) group learning behavior has a cross-level moderating influence on the relationship between cognitive absorption and participant learning,thus mitigating the negative effects of absorption.
作者 刘雯雯
出处 《中国人力资源开发》 北大核心 2015年第5期50-59,共10页 Human Resources Development of China
关键词 认知专注 团队学习 个人学习 管理培训 Cognitive Absorption Group Learning Individual Learning Management Training
  • 相关文献

参考文献80

  • 1Agarwal R,Karahanna E.Time flies when you’re having fun:Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage.MIS Quarterly,2000,24(4):665-694.
  • 2Aiken L S,West S G.Multiple regression:Testing and interpreting interactions.London:Sage,1991.
  • 3Alavi M,Leidner D.Research commentary:Computer mediated learning-A call for greater depth and breadth for research.Information Systems Research,2001,12(1):1-10.
  • 4Ancona D G,Caldwell D F.Demography and design:Predictors of new product team performance.Organization Science,1992,3(3):321-341.
  • 5Arbaugh J B.Instructors as facilitators of learner-learner interaction in third generation learning environments.Industrial and Organizational Psychology,2008,1 (4):487-490.
  • 6Bell B S, Kanar A M, Kozlowski S W. Current issues and future directions in simulation-based training in North America. lmemational Journal of Human Resource Management, 2008, 19(8): 1416-1434.
  • 7Bell B S,Kozlowski S W.Active learning:Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes,learning,and adaptability.Journal of Applied Psychology,2008,93(2):296-316.
  • 8Benbunan-Fich R,Hiltz S R.Mediators of the effective-ness of online courses.IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,2003,46(4):298-312.
  • 9Bliese P D.Within-group agreement,non-independence,and reliability:Implications for data aggregation and analysis.In K J Klein,S W Kozlowski,(Eds.),Multilevel theory,research,and methods in organizations.San Francisco,CA:JosseyBass,2000:349-381.
  • 10Burton-Jones A,Straub D W.Reconceptualizing system usage:An approach and empirical test.Information Systems Research,2006,17(3):228-246.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部