期刊文献+

常用第一、二代头孢菌素的体外抗菌活性研究 被引量:8

Studies on In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of the First and Second Generation Cephalosporins
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解不同生产企业的第一、二代头孢菌素对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠埃希菌的体外抗菌活性,为临床选用抗菌药物提供依据。方法选取临床常用的第一、二代头孢菌素制成药敏纸片,采用K-B纸片扩散法进行药敏试验,按NCCLS(2002版)标准判读结果。结果不同生产企业的头孢唑啉与头孢唑啉标准药敏纸片对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠埃希菌的敏感率无显著性差异(P<0.05);头孢硫脒对金黄色葡萄球菌的敏感率与头孢唑啉无显著性差异(P<0.05),对大肠埃希菌的敏感率与头孢唑啉有显著性差异(P<0.05);头孢呋辛及头孢替安对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠埃希菌的敏感率与头孢呋辛标准药敏纸片无显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论不同生产企业的头孢唑啉对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠埃希菌的体外抗菌活性相当;头孢硫脒对金黄色葡萄球菌的体外抗菌活性与头孢唑啉相当,对大肠埃希菌无抗菌活性;头孢呋辛及头孢替安对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠埃希菌的体外抗菌活性相当。 OBJECTIVE To Investigate antibacterial activity of the first and second generation cephalosporins of different manufacturers against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in vitro. METHODS Selected the first and second generation cephalosporins to made susceptibility paper,tested by Kirby-Bauer method,Determinated according to NCCLS( 2008 edition). RESULTS The drug susceptibility rates of Cefazolin of different manufacturers was consistent against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in vitro; The drug sensitivity rate of Cefathiamidine was consistent with Cefazolin's against Staphylococcus aureus in vitro,however,it was different against Escherichia coli( P〈0. 05). The drug susceptibility rates of Cefuroxime was consistent with Cefotiam against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in vitro. CONCLUSION The antibacterial activity of Cefazolin of different manufacturers is similar against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in vitro. The antibacterial activity of Cefathiamidine is Similar to Cefazolin against Staphylococcus aureus in vitro,however,it has no antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli. The antibacterial activity of Cefuroxime is Similar to Cefotiam against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in vitro.
出处 《海峡药学》 2015年第1期47-49,共3页 Strait Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 头孢唑啉 头孢硫脒 头孢呋辛 头孢替安 金黄色葡萄球菌 大肠埃希菌 体外抗菌活性 Cefazolin Cefathiamidine Cefuroxime Cefotiam Staphylococcus aureus Escherichia coli Antibacterial activity in vitro
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献18

共引文献530

同被引文献60

  • 1侯宁,金炎,张文.2004~2005年山东省立医院抗菌药物使用与细菌耐药性调查[J].药物流行病学杂志,2006,15(5):303-305. 被引量:6
  • 2Luz G, Jos6 MB, Jeremy AL, et al. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage[R]. WHO:World Health Report ,2010:18-20.
  • 3Leth RA, Moiler JK, Thomsen RW, et al. Risk of selected postpartum infections after cesarean section compared with va- ginal birth: A five-year cohort study of 32,468 women[J]. Ac- ta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2009,88 (9) : 976-983.
  • 4Hopkins L, Smaill F. Antibiotic prophylaxis regimens and drugs for cesarean section[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007, (2).
  • 5Baaqeel H, Baaqeel tL Timing of administration of prophylactic antibiotics for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta- analysis[J]. BJOI3,2013,120 ( 6 ) : 661-669.
  • 6Costantine M, Rahman M, Ghulmiyah L, et al. Timing of perio- perative antibiotics for cesarean delivery: a meta analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008,199 (3) : 301-306.
  • 7Gibbs RS. Clinical risk factors for puerperal infection[J]. Ob- stet Gynecol, 1980,55(5 Suppl) : 178S-184S.
  • 8Webster J. Post-caesarean wound infection: a review of the risk factors[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 1988,28(3): 201 -207.
  • 9Allegaert K, van Mieghem T, Verbesseh R, et al. Cefazolin pharmacokinetics in maternal plasma and amniotic fluid during pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 200: 170. el-170. e7.
  • 10Thigpen BD, Hood WD, Chauhan S, et al. Timing of prophylac- tic antibiotic administration in the uninfected laboring gravida: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 192,1864-1871.

引证文献8

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部