期刊文献+

博奇论外在主义与自我知识的兼容

Tyler Burge Argument the Compatibility of Externalism and Self-knowledge
原文传递
导出
摘要 博奇(Tyler Burge)对于内容外在论与自我知识的观念提出许多重要的看法。他主张心理内容部分是由思想者之外的社会环境与物理性质所决定,认为外在论与自我知识观念两者是完全兼容的。该观点遭到很多哲学家的质疑,博奇对各种质疑进行了回应,并对自己的观点进行了有效的辩护。 Tyler Burge raises many important views for content Extemalism and the concept of self- knowledge. He advocates that the psychological content part is decided by the social environment and physical properties of the outside thinkers, and that the content externalism and the concept of self- knowledge are totally Compatible. This point is questioned by many philosophers. Burge has responded to these questions, and defensed his views validly.
作者 蒙锡岗
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期103-107,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 教育部人文社科青年项目"当代心灵哲学视野下的马克思主义意识论研究"(10YJC710042) 贵州省教育厅人文社科项目:"马克思主义意识论阐释范式转换研究"
关键词 心理内容 内容外在论 自我知识 兼容 psychological content content externalism self knowledge compatible
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Burge, T. Individualism and the Mental[C]//Peter Ludlow,No- rah Martin. Extemalism and Self-Knowledge. Stanford, Cali- fornia: CSLI Publications, 1998.
  • 2Putnam, H. The Meaning of "Meaning"[C]//Andrew Pessin, Sanford Goldberg. The Twin Earth Chronicles: Twenty Years of Reflection on Hilary Putnam's "The Meaning of 'Mean-ing'". Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1996.
  • 3Burge,T.Individualism and Self-Knowledge[C]//Peter Ludlow, Norah Martin. Extemalism and Self-Knowledge. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications, 1998.
  • 4Burge, T..Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge [C]//Peter Lud- low,Norah Martin. Extemalism and SelfKnowledge. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications, 1998.
  • 5McKinsey, M. Anti-Individualism and Privileged Access[C]// Peter Ludlow,Norah Martin. Externalism and Self-Knowl- edge. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications, 1998.
  • 6Burge, T. Other Bodies[C]//A. Woodfield ed. Thought and 0b-ject,1982.
  • 7Boghossian, P A. Content and Self-Knowledge[C]//P. Ludlow, N. Martin. Externalism and Self-KnowLedge. Stanford, Cali- fornia: CSLI Publieations, 1998.
  • 8Falvey, K. and J,Owens. Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and Skepticism[J]. PhiLosophical Review , 1994.
  • 9郑凯元.心理内容的外在论与自我知识观念是否相容?[D]台湾:国立清华大学哲学研究所,2004.
  • 10高新民,汪波.反个体主义及其宽心灵观[J].自然辩证法研究,2009,25(2):6-11. 被引量:3

二级参考文献8

  • 1普特南“意义”的意义[M]//李绍猛译.陈波,韩林合.逻辑与语言.北京:东方出版,2005:464.
  • 2T Burge. Where in Is Language Social? [M]//C A Anderson, et al (eds.) . Propositional Attitudes. Stanford University,CSLI, 1990.
  • 3T Burge. Davidson to Hahn [M]// M and Forms of Anti-individualism: Repty Hahn, B Rarmberg and Replies :Essays on the Philosophy MIT Press,2003. (eds.). Reflections of T. Burge. MA:MIT Press,2003.
  • 4J Heil. Introduction[M]// J Heil (ed.). Philosophy of Mind:A Guide and Anthology. Oxford.. Oxford University Press, 2004:424.
  • 5T Burge. Individualism and The Mental[M]//J Heil (ed.). Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 6Burge. Some Reflections on Skepticism: Reply to Stroud [M]// M Hahn, B Ramberg (eds.) . Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of T. Burge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
  • 7Burge. The Indexical Strategy: Reply to Owen[M]//M Hahn, B Ramberg (eds.). Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of T. Burge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
  • 8C MeGinn. Mental Content[ M]. Oxford : Blaekwell, 1989.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部