期刊文献+

基于地区CGE模型的碳税效应研究——以上海为例 被引量:9

The Effects Analysis of Carbon Tax Based on CGE Model: Taking Shanghai as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章构建了动态可计算一般均衡模型。利用投入产出表等数据编制了相应的社会核算矩阵,标定模型形成仿真平台。通过设定不同碳税税率和税收收入使用方式,进行了相关模拟。结果表明,碳税能够抑制上海的能源消费,使得二氧化碳的排放量和单位GDP碳强度大幅度降低。在保持税收中性的情况下,征收碳税对经济会有一定负面作用,但有助于提高第三产业比例,优化产业结构,需要注意的是对交通运输及仓储业和炼焦业的负面影响较大。在碳税定价上,认为起征碳税设定在30 CNY/t元较合适,可在"十二五"期间择机开征,"十三五"期间缓慢提升碳税价格,于2020年左右达到50 CNY/t。 To estimate the effects of carbon tax, the paper constructed the dynamic computable general equilibrium model to form the simulation platform, while the social accounting matrix was prepared on the basis of Input-Output table to supply the data base. The policy scenarios were designed according to different tax prices and tax usages, and were stimulated through CGE model. The results indicated that the carbon tax could decrease the energy use in Shanghai, leading to significantly reduction of the carbon dioxide emission amount as well as the carbon intensity. Though the revenue-neutral carbon tax would drop the GDP, it could increase the proportion of tertiary industry and improve the industrial structure. And it should be noted that carbon tax would strongly hurt the transportation and warehousing industry as well as the coking industry. The paper pointed out that the initial carbon tax should be priced at 30 CNY/t, it may begin to collect at a proper time during the 12 th five-year plan period, and the carbon tax slowly should be raised to 50 CNY/t in 2020.
作者 周丹 赵子健
出处 《生态经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期24-28,共5页 Ecological Economy
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目群之重点项目"气候变化背景下低碳农林业发展战略及政策研究:基于作用 潜力和成本效益的分析"(71333010) 上海交通大学博士后研究基金(14X100030025)
关键词 碳税 可计算一般均衡模型 社会核算矩阵 税收中性 carbon tax computable general equilibrium model social accounting matrix revenue-neutral
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献80

共引文献604

同被引文献140

  • 1陈文颖,高鹏飞,何建坤.二氧化碳减排对中国未来GDP增长的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004,44(6):744-747. 被引量:87
  • 2王灿,陈吉宁,邹骥.基于CGE模型的CO_2减排对中国经济的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(12):1621-1624. 被引量:191
  • 3Annegrete Bruvoll,Bodil Merethe Larsen.Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: do carbon taxes work?[J]. Energy Policy . 2003 (4)
  • 4Andrea Baranzini,José Goldemberg,Stefan Speck.A future for carbon taxes[J]. Ecological Economics . 2000 (3)
  • 5Porter Michael E.America’s green strategy. Scientific American . 1991
  • 6Porter ME,Van der Linde C.Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Econometrics . 1995
  • 7Pearce DW.The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming. Economic Journal, The . 1991
  • 8Porter M,van der Linde C.Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business . 1995
  • 9Lawrence H. Goulder,Stephen H. Schneider.??Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO 2 abatement policies(J)Resource and Energy Economics . 1999 (3)
  • 10John C.V. Pezzey,Andrew Park.??Reflections on the Double Dividend Debate(J)Environmental and Resource Economics . 1998 (3)

引证文献9

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部