期刊文献+

考虑风险相关性的软件风险多目标优化控制研究 被引量:11

Multi-object risk control model for software project considering risk correlation
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究软件风险控制的理论和方法,对提高软件开发成功率有着重要作用.面对软件风险管理的精细化要求,已有的单目标风险控制模型难以有效管理软件风险.本文将软件风险控制成本和软件风险暴露值作为控制目标,提出软件风险多目标优化控制模型.进一步将风险损失层面的相关性纳入风险控制模型,建立了考虑风险损失非可加性的风险控制多目标优化模型,刻画软件风险管理实践中存在的风险相关性问题.采用多目标粒子群算法对风险控制多目标优化模型进行求解,并采用一个软件开发项目的风险控制问题进行案例分析.分析结果表明,在软件风险暴露和软件风险控制成本两个目标之间近似呈现非线性置换关系,可以根据项目中风险控制成本的实际情况,快速找到对应的最优风险控制策略.考虑风险相关性的风险控制模型能刻画出软件风险管理实践中更加复杂的关系,给出更加符合实际情况的风险控制策略,对提高软件风险管理水平有着重要意义. Research on software risk control theories and methods play an important role in improving the success rate of software project. With the requirement of software risk refined management, the existing single-objective risk control model is difficult to manage software risks effectively. This paper regards software risk control cost and software risk exposure as control objectives, and proposes a multi-object risk control model for software project. Furthermore, it puts forward a multi-object risk control model for software project considering risk correlation. The multi-objective particle swarm optimization is applied to solve the risk control model. Moreover, the example is applied to a medium-sized software project. Case analysis results show that there is a nonlinear trade-off relationship approximately between the software risk exposure and software risk control effort. The software manager can identify the corresponding optimal risk control strategy according to the actual risk control cost. The results also indicate that the consequence from the multi-object risk control model for software project considering risk correlation can better describe the actual situation of risk management.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期578-586,共9页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(71201156 91218302) 中科院科技政策与管理科学研究所重大研究任务(Y201161Z05) 中国科学院青年创新促进会基金
关键词 软件风险 风险相关性 风险控制 多目标优化 多目标粒子群算法 software risk risk correlation risk control multi-objective optimization multi-objective par- ticle swarm optimization (MOPSO)
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1The Standish Group. CHAOS Summary 2009[EB/OL]. http://www.standishgroup.com/newsroom/chaos_2009. php, 2009.
  • 2Cerpa N, Verner J M. Why did your project fail?[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2009, 52(12): 130-134.
  • 3Iversen J H, Mathiassen L, Nielsen P A. Managing risk in software process improvement: An action research approach[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2004, 28(3): 395-433.
  • 4陈涛,丛国栋,于本海,张金隆.基于风险管理的软件开发过程模型及其复合实物期权分析[J].管理工程学报,2010,24(2):61-67. 被引量:7
  • 5Ben-David I, Raz T. An integrated approach for risk response development in project planning[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2001, 52(1): 14-25.
  • 6潘春光,陈英武.基于CMMI的软件项目风险缓解策略优化模型研究[J].计算机科学,2007,34(4):279-281. 被引量:7
  • 7杨莉,李南.软件项目风险应对措施优选的区间模型及其算法[J].控制与决策,2011,26(4):530-534. 被引量:11
  • 8Zhang Y, Fan Z P. An optimization method for selecting project risk response strategies[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2014, 32(3): 412-422.
  • 9Keil M, Li L, Mathiassen L, et al. The influence of checklists and roles on software practitioner risk perception and decision-making[J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2008, 81(6): 908-919. .
  • 10Brito M, May J. Safety critical software process improvement by multi-objective optimization algorithms[C]// Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2007, 4470: 96-108.

二级参考文献123

共引文献537

同被引文献119

引证文献11

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部