期刊文献+

天蓝苜蓿锌胁迫下实时定量PCR内参基因筛选 被引量:10

Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR normalization in Medicago Lupulina under zinc stress
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选取8个管家基因(h2a、act、18s、tub、ubi、ef1、cyp、gapdh)作为候选内参基因,以不同浓度Zn2+处理下接菌第30d的天蓝苜蓿(Medicago Lupulina L.)接种根为实验材料,筛选用于目的基因实时荧光定量PCR分析的最佳内参基因.研究表明:候选内参基因平均表达稳定性由高到低排序为:ef1>ubi>act>h2a>gapdh>cyp>18s>tub;在不同Zn2+浓度胁迫下,最适内参基因组合各不相同:Zn2+=100mg/kg时,最佳内参基因组合为tub(1.97)和ef1(2.06);Zn2+=200mg/kg时,最佳内参基因组合为ef1(1.41)和ubi(2.51);Zn2+=300mg/kg时,最佳内参基因组合为ef1(1.41)和h2a(2.78);Zn2+=400mg/kg时,最佳内参基因组合为ef1(2.45)和act(2.55).该研究可为重金属污染地天蓝苜蓿抗性基因和共生基因的表达分析提供理论依据. Expression stability of candidate reference genes(h2a、act、18s、tub、ubi、ef1、cyp、gapdh) was tested for q RT-PCR during growth conditions under the different zinc stress. The roots of Medicago lupulina inoculated with rhizobia were harvested in 30 days as plant materials. Our results showed that the average expression stability of the eight candidate reference genes from high to low was ef1ubiacth2agapdhcyp18stub overall. Specifically, tub(1.97) and ef1(2.06) were better reference genes under the low Zn2+ concentration(100mg/kg); The genes ef1(1.41) and ubi(2.51) were the best genes under Zn2+ concentration(200mg/kg); Under Zn2+ concentration(300mg/kg), ef1(1.41) and h2a(2.78) were the most comparatively suitable genes; while ef1(2.45) and act(2.55) were considered as the most reliable reference genes under the high Zn2+ concentration(400mg/kg). In conclusion, All results provide the theoretical foundation for gene expression study in Medicago lupulina under the different Zn2+ concentration.
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期833-838,共6页 China Environmental Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(31172252)
关键词 天蓝苜蓿 接种根 内参基因 实时荧光定量PCR Medicago Lupulina the inoculated roots reference gene quantitative real-time PCR Zn
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1曾思坚.珠江三角洲经济区农业生态环境现状与对策[J].热带亚热带土壤科学,1995,4(4):242-245. 被引量:5
  • 2赵磊,崔岩山,杜心,朱永官.利用道南膜技术(DMT)研究土壤中重金属自由离子浓度[J].环境科学学报,2005,25(11):1565-1569. 被引量:15
  • 3周冰,曹诚,刘传暄.翻译延伸因子1A的研究进展[J].生物技术通讯,2007,18(2):281-284. 被引量:39
  • 4王琪,吕静,娄永根(2010).植物诱导抗虫性的化学与分子机理.见:孔垂华,娄永根主编,化学生态学前沿.北京:高等教育出版社.PP.201-233.
  • 5Du B, Zhang WL, Liu BF, Hu J, Wei Z, Shi ZY, He RF, Zhu LL, Chen RZ, Han B, He GC (2009). Identification and characterization of Bph14, a gene conferring resistance to brown planthopper in rice. Proc NaU Acad Sci USA 106, 22163-22168.
  • 6Hu J, Zhou JB, Peng XX, Xu HH, Liu CX, Du B, Yuan HY, Zhu LL, He GC (2011). The BphiOO8a gene interacts with the ethylene pathway and transcriptionally regulates MAPK genes in the response of rice to brown planthopper feeding. Plant Physiol 156, 856-872.
  • 7Jain M (2009). Genome-wide identification of novel internal control genes for normalization of gene expression during various stages of development in rice. Plant Sci 176, 702-706.
  • 8Jain M, Nijhawan A, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP (2006). Vali- dation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 345, 646-651.
  • 9Li QF, Sun SSM, Yuan DY, Yu HX, Gu MH, Liu QQ (2010). Validation of candidate reference genes for the accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data in rice during seed development. Plant Mol Biol Rep 28, 49-57.
  • 10Li XY, Qian Q, Fu ZM, Wang YH, Xiong GX, Zeng DL, Wang XQ, Liu XF, Teng S, Hiroshi F, Yuan M, Luo D, Hart B, Li JY (2003). Control of tillering in rice. Nature 422.618-621.

共引文献132

同被引文献130

引证文献10

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部