期刊文献+

考虑交易成本的投资组合效率估计方法 被引量:13

Technical Efficiency Evaluation Approach for Portfolios with Transaction Costs
原文传递
导出
摘要 投资组合绩效评价是学术界研究的热点问题。本文在经典的经济学框架下,基于真实前沿面,给出了投资组合效率的明确定义。由于实际投资环境的影响,投资组合优化模型非常复杂,难以获得真实前沿面的解析解,这给投资组合效率的应用带来了很大的困难。本文基于投资组合理论,在投资组合模型所对应的前沿面为凹函数的情况下,采用基于数据的投资组合DEA评价模型构造前沿面来逼近真实的前沿面,从而估计一般情形下投资组合的效率。在此基础上研究了考虑交易成本的投资组合效率评价问题,并用实例说明了本文方法的合理性与可行性。 Portfolio performance is an academic hotspot for researchers.Within the classical framework of economics,the definition of portfolio efficiency is provided based on the efficient frontier.However,in practical situations,the portfolio optimization models are usually very complicated,and thus the analytical solutions of frontier are very difficult to obtain.Under the assumption that the real efficient frontier is a concave function,DEA model is adopted to approximate the real frontier and portfolio efficiencies.The problem of evaluating the portfolio efficiency on considering transaction costs is examined.In the end,some examples are presented to show the practicality and feasibility of the proposed approach.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期25-33,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371067 71431008)
关键词 投资组合效率 有效前沿面 数据包络分析 交易成本 portfolio efficiency efficient frontier data envelopment analysis transaction costs
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Markowitz H. Portfolio selection [J]. Journal of Fi- nance, 1952, 7(1): 77--91.
  • 2Joro T, Na P. Portfolio performance evaluation in a mean- variance-skewness framework[J]. European Journal of Op- erational Research, 2006, 175 (1) : 446-- 461.
  • 3Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring effi ciency of decision making units [J]. European of Oper ational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429--444.
  • 4BankerR D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data en velopment analysis [J]. Management Science, 1984, 30 (9): 1078-1092.
  • 5Lobo M S, Fazel M, Boyd S. Portfolio optimization with linear and fixed transaction costs [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2007, 152(1): 341--365.
  • 6Angelelli E, Mansini R, Speranza M G. A comparison of MAD and CVaR models with real features [J]. Jour- nal of Banking and Finance, 2008, 32(7) : 1188-1197.
  • 7Bertsimas D,Pachamanova D. Robust multiperiod port- folio management in the presence of transaction costs [J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2008, 35 (1): 3-17.
  • 8Ben-Tal A, Margalit T, Nemirovski A. Robust modeling of multi-stage portfolio problems [M]//Frenk H, Roos K, Terlaky T, et al. High performance optimization. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.
  • 9Yu J R, Lee W Y. Portfolio rebalaneing model using multiple criteria [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 209(2): 166-175.
  • 10Best M J, Hlouskova J. An algorithm for portfolio op- timization with variable transaction costs, part 1: theo- ry [J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applica- tions, 2007, 135(3): 563-581.

同被引文献52

引证文献13

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部