差异与融合:最新三大不当得利示范法比较研究被引量：5

Differences and Integration:Comparative Study on Three Latest Model Laws of Unjust Enrichment

导出

摘要不当得利是最近十余年里两大法系投入智识最多的领域之一,欧洲示范民法典不当得利编、美国《第三次返还与不当得利法重述》和《英国不当得利法重述》在最近三、四年间相继问世。由于制度历史与知识背景的原因,美国不当得利法重述仍然没有脱离返还法固有规范框架,欧洲不当得利法草案尽管是两大法系整合的结果但仍更具大陆法色彩,英国不当得利法重述是前两个示范法进一步整合的结果,其首次将不当得利从返还法中独立出来,在内容上兼具大陆法与英美法的特点。尽管存在这些差异,但三大示范法体系与内容上的融合趋势亦十分明显,三者的规范模式、立法基础与立法方式几乎完全一致,在不当得利构成要件、不当得利请求权效力与请求权竞合等问题上亦都取得了较多的共识。我国不当得利立法至少可从七个方面充分借鉴该三大示范法的融合之处。 Unjust enrichment is one of the most intelligence investment topics in the world in the recent ten years, as a result, DCFR, R3RUE and RELUE in the last three or four years have been published. Due to institutional history and knowl- edge background, R3RUE is still not out of the inherent restitution law, and DCFR still has more Continental Law System col- ors. RELUE, however, has further integration of the other Model Laws, and it is also the first time that unjust enrichment law is independent from the restitution law. But despite these differences, but the integrative trend in the three Model Law on the system and the content is also very obvious, such as the mode, basis, the way of legislation, and the elements of unjust enrichment, the right effect of unjust enrichment, and the rules of concurrent obligations. Chinese unjust enrichment legislation should learn from the three unjust enrichment model laws.

作者范雪飞

机构地区西南政法大学民商法学院

出处《法学评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期122-128,共7页 Law Review

基金西南政法大学2012年重点研究项目<不当得利比较研究--以两大法系制度整合为背景>的阶段性成果

关键词不当得利欧洲示范民法典美国返还与不当得利法重述英国不当得利法重述融合差异 Unjust Enrichment DCFR R3RUE RELUE Difference Integration

分类号 D913 [政治法律—民商法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1David Johnston, Reinhard Zimmermann, Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Perspective, Cam- bridge University Press 2004, p. 1.
2[德]梅迪库斯.《德国债法分论》,杜景林,卢谌译,法律出版社,2007年版,第616页.
3[德]梅迪库斯.《请求权基础》,张双根等译,法律出版社2012年版.
4[英]皮特·博克斯.《不当得利》,刘桥译,清华大学出版社2012年版,第266页.
5Study Group on a European Civil Code and Research Group on EC Private Law (Acquis Group) Prepared, Christian yon Bar and Eric Clive Edited, Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), Full Edition, Sellier European Law Publishers, 2009, p. I. Introduction.
6Andrew Burrows, A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, 2012.
7Hugh Collins, The European Civil Code: The Way Forward, Cambridge University Press, 2008, p. 2, p. 189.
8American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law of Restitution, quasi contracts and constructive trusts, Ameri- can Law Institute Publishers 1937.
9American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law: Restitution and Unjust Enrichment, Discussion Draft (March 31, 2000) American Law Institute Publishers 2000, p. XV.
10Andrew Kull, Three Restatements of Restitution, WASH. & LEE L. REV. (2011), p. 867-875.