期刊文献+

不同管状和材料对结构能量吸收性能的影响 被引量:3

Effects of Section and Material of Tubes on Energy Absorption
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出了评价和比较各类管件结构的能量吸收性能的评估指标体系,具体指标为:有效行程比(ESR)、结构承载能力(NLC)、单位重量的能量吸收能力(SEA)、吸能有效率(EEA)和载荷波动度(ULC).为了分析截面和材料对管件能量吸收能力的影响,比较了铝合金和低碳钢2种材料的圆管和方管的能量吸收性能.结果表明:在相同密实度下,圆管的能量吸收能力要优于方管,且在同一截面的管件中,铝合金管件的能量吸收能力和载荷波动程度要优于低碳钢管件. Based on our extensive studies in the last few years, a set of Key Performance Indicators(KPIs) is proposed to assess and compare the energy absorbing performance of tubular structures with various configurations so as to offer the guidelines for the design of energy absorbers whilst to archive optimization to a certain degree. The set of KPIs contains five indicators, which are Effective Stroke Ratio(ESR), Non-dimensional Load-carrying Capacity(NLC), Effectiveness of Energy Absorption(EEA), Specific Energy Absorption(SEA), and Undulation of Load-carrying Capacity(NLC). In this paper, a series of diagrams is presented to compare the energy absorbing performance of circular and square tubes made in aluminum and mild steel in terms of the five KPIs. The results show that the energy absorption capacity of circular tubes is superior to that of square tubes, although their KPIs as the functions of solidity ratio usually follow similar trends. It is also found that the specific energy absorption and undulation of aluminum tubes are superior to that of the mild steel tubes.
出处 《宁波大学学报(理工版)》 CAS 2015年第2期85-90,共6页 Journal of Ningbo University:Natural Science and Engineering Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金(11032001)
关键词 能量吸收 评估指标 铝合金 低碳钢 energy absorption key performance indicators aluminum mild steel
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Alghamdi A A A.Collapsible impact energy absorbers: An overview[J].Thin-walled Structures,2001,39(2): 189-213.
  • 2Hanssen A G,Langseth M,Hopperstad O S.Static and dynamic crushing of circular aluminum extrusions with aluminum foam filler[J].Int J Impact Engng,2000,24(5):475-507.
  • 3Di-Paolo B P,Monteiro P J M,Gronsky R.Quasi-static axial crush response of a thin-wall,stainless steel box component[J].Int J Solids Struct,2004,41(14):3707- 3733.
  • 4Jandaghi S V,Marzbanrad J.Analytical and experimental studies on quasi-static axial crush behavior of thin-walled tailor-made aluminum tubes[J].Thin-walled Structures,2012,60:24-37.
  • 5Alexander J M.An approximate analysis of the collapse of thin cylindrical shells under axial loading[J].Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics,1960,13:10-15.
  • 6Abramowicz W,Jones N.Dynamic progressive buckling of circular and square tubes[J].Int J Impact Engng,1986,4(4):243-270.
  • 7Singace A A,Slsobky H.Further experimental investiga- tion on the eccentricity factor in the progressive crushing of tubes[J].Int J Solids Struct,1996,33(24):3517-3538.
  • 8Seitzberger M,Rammerstorfer F G,Gradinger R,et al.Experimental studies on the quasi-static axial crushing of steel columns filled with aluminum foam[J].Int J Solids Struct,2000,37(30):4125-4147.
  • 9Yu T X,Xiang Y F,Wang M,et al.Key performance indicators of tubes used as energy absorbers[C]//The 12th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Engineering Plasticity and Its Applications (AEPA2014),Taiwan,2014:155-161.
  • 10Wang M,Yang L M,Yu T X.A further study on the energy absorption capability of thin wall tubes under axial crushing[C]//The 3rd International Symposium on Plasticity and Impact (ISPI2011),Hong Kong and Nansha,2011:8-13.

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部