期刊文献+

喹硫平与利培酮治疗成人精神分裂症疗效及安全性的Meta分析 被引量:12

The Efficacy and Safety of Quetiapine and Risperidone for Schizophrenia:A Meta-Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价喹硫平与利培酮治疗成人精神分裂症的疗效及安全性。方法检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、EBSCO、CNKI、SinoMed、VIP和WANFANG DATA等(时间均从建库到2014年11月),纳入喹硫平与利培酮对治疗成人精神分裂症的随机对照试验(RCT)进行比较,对文献进行质量评价,根据评价纳入研究,采用RM 5.3软件进行分析。结果共纳入6个RCT,包括2 107例精神分裂症患者。Meta分析结果显示:1)喹硫平组因缺乏疗效的终止治疗率较利培酮组高[RR=1.31,95%CI(1.10~1.55),P=0.002];2)喹硫平组因无法耐受的终止治疗率与利培酮组相当[RR=1.18,95%CI(0.90~1.53),P=0.23];3)不良反应发生率不一,喹硫平组嗜睡较多[RR=1.29,95%CI(1.11~1.50),P=0.000 9];利培酮组失眠较多[RR=0.75,95%CI(0.62~0.91),P=0.004];两组性功能紊乱比较差异无统计学意义[RR=0.73,95%CI(0.50~1.06),P=0.09];两组锥体外系反应比较差异无统计学意义[RR=0.56,95%CI(0.25~1.29),P=0.18];4)血糖、甘油三酯和催乳素等资料异质性太大,未做Meta分析。结论喹硫平疗效不及利培酮,而安全性与其相当。 Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of quetiapine and risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP and WANFANG DATA (from inception to November 2014) to obtain randomized controlled trails (RCT) comparing quetiapine with risperidone for schizophrenia. The quality of the included trails was evaluated and meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software. Results Six RCT involving 2 107 patients were included. The results of meta analysis showed that the effectiveness of the quetiapine group was lower than that of the risperidone group: [RR= 1. 31,95% CI (1. 10,1.55),P=0. 002] the safety of the two groups were similar [RR= 1.18,95%CI (0.90,1.53),P-0. 231. Adverse events., the incidence of somnolence in the quetiapine group was higher than the risperidone group [RR = 1.29,95%CI (1. 11,1. 50),P=0. 000 9],the incidence of insomnia in the quetiapine group was lower than the risperidone group [RR=0. 75,95%CI (0.62,0.91) ,P=0. 004],the incidences of sexual imbalance in the two group were Similar[RR=0.73,95%CI (0.50,1.06) ,P=0. 092,the incidences of extrapyramidal effects in the two group were similar [RR=0.56,95%CI (0.25,1.99) ,P=0. 18]. Other outcomes could not be analyzed,because there was significant heterogeneity. Conclusion The efficiency of quetiapine is less effective than risperidone, however, both of them have the same safety.
出处 《成都医学院学报》 CAS 2015年第1期70-75,共6页 Journal of Chengdu Medical College
关键词 喹硫平 利培酮 精神分裂症 META分析 Quetiapine Risperidone Schizophrenia Meta-Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献11

  • 1Upton N,Reed V.The influence of social support on caregiver coping.Int J Psychiatr Nurs Res,2006,11(2):1256-1267
  • 2Lauber C,Eichenberger A,Luginbuhl P,et al.Determinants of burden in caregivers of patients with exacerbating schizophrenia.Eur Psychiatry,2003,18 (6):285-289
  • 3Hu TW.The economic burden of depression and reimbursement policy in the Asia Pacific region.Australas Psychiatry,2004,12 (Suppl):S11-S15
  • 4Vos T,Haby MM,Barendregt JJ,et al.The burden of major depression avoidable by longer-term treatment strategies.Arch Gen Psychiatry.2004 Nov;61(11):1097-1103
  • 5Murray-Swank AB,Lucksted A,Medoff DR,et al.Religiosity,psychosocial adjustment,and subjective burden of persons who care for those with mental illness.Psychiatr Serv,2006,57(3):361-365
  • 6Kris AE,Cherlin EJ,Prigerson H,et al.Length of Hospice Enrollment and Subsequent Depression in Family Caregivers:13-Month Follow-Up Study.Am J Geriatr Psychiatry,2006,14(3):264-269
  • 7Gavois H,Paulsson G,Fridlund B.Mental health professional support in families with a member suffering from severe mental illness:a grounded theory model.Scand J Caring Sci,2006,20(1):102-109
  • 8顾牛范,笪志民.抗精神病新药奎太平[J].上海精神医学,1998,10(2):123-125. 被引量:11
  • 9黄世勋,冯春霞,陈九义,刘冬青.利培酮与氯丙嗪治疗精神分裂症的随机双盲比较[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2000,19(5):396-398. 被引量:8
  • 10关念红,王相兰,张晋碚,王厚亮,张国超.利培酮对精神分裂症病人内分泌和体液免疫功能的影响[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2000,19(6):507-509. 被引量:10

共引文献137

同被引文献138

  • 1侯成业,赵悦,陈智敏,温乃义,侯书琦,梁英.利培酮和氯氮平治疗精神分裂症对白细胞影响的对照研究[J].医药导报,2015,34(S01):17-18. 被引量:9
  • 2黄佳,苑成梅,方贻儒.双相障碍早期识别的研究进展[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(11):1550-1553. 被引量:11
  • 3王继堃,许秀峰,杨建中.精神分裂症与NRG-1基因的研究进展[J].国际精神病学杂志,2007,34(1):9-11. 被引量:8
  • 4秦和平,黄永进,杨焕.奎硫平与利培酮治疗老年期精神分裂症对照研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2007,17(2):127-127. 被引量:3
  • 5Krakowski MI, Czoisor P, Citrome L. Atypical antipsychotic agents in the treatment of violent patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder [ J ]. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006,63 ( 6 ) : 622-629.
  • 6Miyamoto S, Duncan GE, Marx CE, et al. Teatments for snhizophrenia : a critical review of pharmacology and mechanisms of action of antipsy-chotic drugs [ J ]. Mol Psychiatry, 2005,10 ( 1 ) : 79-104.
  • 7Rosenheck R, Perlick D, Bingham S, et al. Effectiveness and cost of olanzapine and haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randoized controlled trial[ J ]. JAMA,2003,290 (20) :2693-2702.
  • 8Erdo~gan S. Quetiapine in substance use disorders, abuse and depen-dence possibility : a review[ J]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg,2010, 21:167-175.
  • 9Buckley PF. Efficacy of quetiapine for the treatment of schizophrenia: a combined analysis of three placebo-controlled trials[ J]. Curt Med Res Opin ,2004,20 : 1357-1363.
  • 10Potkin SG, Gharabawi GM, Greenspan AJ, et al. A double-bllnd compa-rison of rispefidone quetiapine and placebo in patients withschizophrenia experiencing an acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization [ J ]. Sehizophr Res, 2006,85 : 254-265.

引证文献12

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部