期刊文献+

肥胖孕妇剖宫产术的2种麻醉方法对比 被引量:1

A Comparison on Two Anesthesia Methods in Cesarean Section for Obese Pregnant Women
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究腰-硬联合麻醉和硬膜外麻醉,哪种麻醉方式效果更优。方法:选取70例于2011年5月∽2012年5月期间在某院产科接受剖宫产的肥胖孕产妇,随机分为实验组35例和对照组35例;实验组35例肥胖孕妇选择腰-硬联合麻醉,对照组35例肥胖孕妇剖宫产选择的麻醉方式为硬膜外麻醉,观察2组麻醉疗效。结果:实验组35例肥胖孕妇采用的腰-硬联合麻醉的效果较对照组要好,实验组较对照组的麻醉并发症发生率低,分别为14.2%、42.8%,P〈0.05,具有统计意义。结论:对于剖宫产的肥胖产妇采取腰-硬联合麻醉方法,安全性高、药效快,值得临床推广。 Objective:To study combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia and decide which one is better.Methods:70 cases of obese pregnant women who received cesarean section in the obstet-rics department in some hospital during the period from May 2011 to May 2012 were selected and were ran-domly divided into the experimental group and control group,35 cases for each group.Spinal-epidural anes-thesia were selected for the 35 cases of obese pregnant women in experimental group ,while epidural anes-thesia was operated on 35 cases of obese pregnant women in control group ,and anesthesia effects of the two groups were observed.Results:The anesthesia effects of spinal-epidural anesthesia conducted on the 35 cases in experimental group were better than that in control group,the complication rate of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group,and were 14.2%% and 42.8% respectively.The difference was statistically significant,(P<0.05).Conclusion:Spinal-epidural anesthesia features safety and quick effi-ciency in cesarean section for obese pregnant women,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
出处 《数理医药学杂志》 2015年第3期338-339,共2页 Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词 2种麻醉方法 肥胖孕妇 剖宫产术 two anesthesia methods obese pregnant women cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1王海鹂.腰麻—硬膜外联合麻醉在急诊剖宫产术中的应用[J].延安大学学报(医学科学版),2010,8(3):32-33. 被引量:3
  • 2乔福元,龚洵.肥胖妇女的妊娠期疾病[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2004,20(12):713-715. 被引量:11
  • 3陈惠池,张惠丹.肥胖孕妇的分娩期并发症[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2004,20(12):715-717. 被引量:26
  • 4龙云辉,郑萍,唐新龙.剖宫产术后不同PCA镇痛方法对应激的影响[J].现代保健(医学创新研究),2007(05X):23-25. 被引量:3
  • 5Pinder A, Bamber J, Dresner M. A cardiodynamic investigation of the use of lateral tilt during spinal anaesthesia [J]. International Joural of Obstetric Anesthesia, 2002,11 ( 3 ) : 156-159.
  • 6Mendonca C, Griffiths J, Ateleanu B, et al. Hypotension following combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section: left lateral position vs. tilted supine position[J]. Anaesthesia, 2003,58 (5) :428-431.
  • 7Patel M, Samsoon G, Swami A, et al. Posture and the spread of hyperbaric bupivaeaine in parturients using the combined spinal epidural technique [J]. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 1993,40 (10) : 943-946.
  • 8Kinsella SM, Whitwam JG, Spencer JAD. Aortic compression by the uterus: identification with the Finapres digital arterial pressure instrument [J]. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990,97(8): 700-705.
  • 9Russell R, Popat M, Richards E, et al. Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section, a randomized comparison of Oxford, lateral and siting positions [J]. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 2002, 11 (3) : 190-195.
  • 10Yun EM, Marx GF, Santos AC. The effects of maternal position during induction of combined spinalepidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery [J]. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 1998,87(3) :614-618.

共引文献7

同被引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部