跨国企业对外投资模式选择研究述评与展望被引量：3

Review and Outlook of Research on OFDI Mode Selection of Multinational

下载PDF

导出

摘要文章基于传统跨国公司理论,以海外投资进入方式的选择与股权比例安排为视角探讨影响跨国企业对外投资模式选择的内在机制。在现有文献基础上,本文得出如下结论:为了更有效地参与全球价值链竞争,跨国企业应调整单一对外投资模式,探寻股权模式与非股权模式"双管齐下"的跨国投资新思路。 Based on traditional multinational theory, this paper discusses the internal mechanism of foreigninvestment mode selection from the perspective of the traditional theories about MNCs, choices of invest-ment entry mode and proportion of equity arrangement. According to the present literature, we draw the fol-lowing conclusion： In order to be more competitive in the global value chains, MNCs should adjust the sin-gle foreign investment pattern and explore a new idea of transnational investment which works along bothownership mode and non- ownership mode.

作者周经张利敏

机构地区安徽财经大学国际经济贸易学院

出处《兰州商学院学报》 2015年第1期36-40,共5页 Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College

基金国家社会科学基金一般项目"非股权安排对中国企业海外投资的影响及政策研究"(12BGJ039) 教育部人文社科青年项目"基于产品内分工的我国对外直接投资模式转变研究"(12YJC790288) 国家社科基金青年项目"知识产权贸易对我国实施创新驱动战略的影响及对策研究"(13CJY099)

关键词对外投资模式非股权安排制度距离垄断优势 foreign investment modes non - equity arrangement institutional distance monopolyadvantage

分类号 F830.59 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1蒋冠宏,蒋殿春.中国对发展中国家的投资——东道国制度重要吗?[J].管理世界,2012,28(11):45-56. 被引量：265
2李国学.制度约束与对外直接投资模式[J].国际经济评论,2013(1):160-172. 被引量：3
3任兵,郑莹.外来者劣势研究前沿探析与未来展望[J].外国经济与管理,2012,34(2):27-34. 被引量：37

二级参考文献70

1Barnard H. Overcoming the liability of foreignness without strong firm capabilities: The value of market-based resources [J]. Journal of International Management, 2010,16 (2) : 165- 176.
2Black J S and Mendenhall M. Cross-cultural training effective- ness:A review and theoretical framework for future research [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15 (1): 113-136.
3Calhoun M A. Unpacking liability of foreignness: Identifying culturally driven external and internal sources of liability for the foreign subsidiary[J]. Journal of International Manage- ment,2002,8(3):301-321.
4Eden L and Miller S R. Distance matters: Liability of foreign- ness,institutional distance and ownership strategy[A]. Hitt M A and Cheng J (Eds.). Advances in international manage- ment[C], New York: Elsevier, 2004 : 187- 221.
5Hennart J F, et al. Do exits proxy a liability of foreignness? The case of Japanese exits from the US[J]. Journal of Inter- national Management, 2002,8 (3) : 241 - 264.
6Henisz W and Williamson O. Comparative economic organiza- tion within and between countries[J]. Business and Politics, 1999,1 (3) : 261 -276.
7Hymer S. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960/1976 : 34- 35.
8Insch G S and Miller S R. Perception of foreignness: Benefit or liability[J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2005,17 (4) : 423- 438.
9Kaiser U and Sofka W. The pulse of liability of foreignness= Dynamic legitimacy and experience effects in the German car market[R]. ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 06-070,2006.
10Klossek A, et al. Chinese enterprises in Germany: Establish- ment modes and strategies to mitigate the liability of foreign- ness[J]. Journal of World Business,2012,47(1) :35-44.