期刊文献+

依赖随机参考点的网络均衡配流模型 被引量:3

Network Equilibrium Assignment Model Depended on Stochastic Reference Point
下载PDF
导出
摘要 所建立模型明确考虑了随机参考点作为累积前景理论(CPT)描述出行者有限理性路径选择行为的补充,将其定义为随机最短行程时间和可接受系数的乘积.假设出行者遵循路径累积前景最大化原则进行路径选择,建立相应的随机均衡条件及等价的不动点模型.然后,给出基于Probit加载和相继平均法(MSA)的启发式算法,并在小型网络上验证所提出的模型和算法.算例结果表明,依赖随机参考点的交通流模式能够较为真实地再现出行者在路径选择时,同时考虑行程时间均值及随机波动的有限理性行为.对参数进行灵敏度分析,基于CPT得到的路网均衡状态基本上不受行程时间随机波动程度变化的影响,当出行者调整出行时间预算时,均衡状态将随之发生改变. As a complement for describing travelers' boundedly rational route choice behavior by cumulative prospect theory, the stochastic reference point is explicitly considered. It is defined as a product of stochastic shortest travel time and acceptable coefficient. By assuming that travelers follow the rule of maximizing route cumulative prospect to choose the route, corresponding stochastic equilibrium condition and equivalent fixed point model are established. Then, a heuristic algorithm is given based on Probit loading and method of successive averages. The proposed model and algorithm are testified on a small network.Numerical results show that the traffic flow pattern depending on stochastic reference point can virtually represent travelers' boundedly rational behavior through average travel time and fluctuation. Due to the sensitivity analysis of parameters, the network equilibrium state from CPT remains unchanged with different travel time fluctuations, but varies when travelers adjust their travel time budgets.
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期100-105,136,共7页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51278429 51308425)
关键词 城市交通 均衡配流模型 累积前景理论 随机参考点 有限理性 urban traffic equilibrium assignment model cumulative prospect theory stochastic reference point bounded rationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Sheffi Y.Urban transportation networks:equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods[M].Prentice Hall,Inc.,Englewood Cliffs,NJ,1985.
  • 2Boyce D.Forecasting travel on congested urban transportation networks:review and prospects for network equilibrium models[J].Networks and Spatial Economics,2007,7(2):99-128.
  • 3Avineri E,Prashker JN.Violations of expected utility theory in route-choice stated preferences:certainty effect and inflation of small probabilities[J].Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2004,1894(1):222- 229.
  • 4Bogers E,Van Zuylen H.The importance of reliability in route choices in freight transport for various actors on various levels[C].Proceedings of the European Transport Conference,2004.
  • 5Kahneman D,Tversky A.Prospect theory:an analysis of decision under risk[J].Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society,1979,263-291.
  • 6Tversky A,Kahneman D.Advances in prospect theory:cumulative representation of uncertainty[J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1992,5(4):297-323.
  • 7Avineri E.The effect of reference point on stochastic network equilibrium[J].Transportation Science,2006,40 (4):409-420.
  • 8Connors RD,Sumalee A.A network equilibrium model with travellers’perception of stochastic travel times[J].Transportation Research Part B:Methodological,2009,43(6):614-624.
  • 9刘玉印,刘伟铭,田世艳.出行者有限理性条件下混合策略网络均衡模型[J].公路交通科技,2011,28(7):136-141. 被引量:13
  • 10徐红利,周晶,徐薇.基于累积前景理论的随机网络用户均衡模型[J].管理科学学报,2011,14(7):1-7. 被引量:26

二级参考文献50

  • 1罗剑,王树盛,李旭宏,潘俊卿.出行方式选择行为的个体时间感知差异性建模分析[J].公路交通科技,2007,24(2):114-117. 被引量:10
  • 2刘天亮,欧阳恋群,黄海军.ATIS作用下的混合交通行为网络与效率损失上界[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(4):154-159. 被引量:23
  • 3赵凛,张星臣.基于“前景理论”的路径选择行为建模及实例分析[J].土木工程学报,2007,40(7):82-86. 被引量:29
  • 4Wardrop J G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research[C]//Proceeding of Institute of Civil Engineers, 1952, Part II: 325- 378.
  • 5Daganzo C F, Sheffi Y. On stochastic models of traffic assignment[J]. Transportation Science, 1977(11): 253-274.
  • 6Watling D. User equilibrium traffic network assignment with stochastic travel times and late arrival penalty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006(3): 1539 -1556.
  • 7Huang H, Li Z. A multi-class, multi-criteria logit-based traffic equilibrium assignment model under ATIS[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007(3): 1464 -1477.
  • 8Kim H, Oh J S, Jayakrishnan R. Effects of user equilibrium assumptions on network traffic pattern[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2009, 13(2): 117- 127.
  • 9Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263- 291.
  • 10Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainly, 1992(5): 297 -323.

共引文献88

同被引文献24

  • 1MORGANTI E, SEIDEL S, BLANQUART C, et al. The impact of E-commerce on final deliveries: Alternative parcel delivery services in France and Germany[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2014, 4(0): 178-190.
  • 2SONG L, CHERRETT T J, GUAN W. Implications of collection/delivery points for transport and logistics[J]. Or Insight, 2011, 24(4): 231-255.
  • 3SONG L, GUAN W, CHERRETT T, et al. Quantifying the greenhouse gas emissions of local collectionand- delivery points for last-mile deliveries[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013(2340): 66-73.
  • 4COLLINS A. Behavioural influences on the environmental impact of collection/delivery points[M]. Fahimnia B, Bell M G H, Hensher D A, et al, Springer International Publishing, 2015.
  • 5HAYEL Y, QUADRI D, JIMéNEZ T, et al. Decentralized optimization of last-mile delivery services with non-cooperative bounded rational customers[J]. Annals of Operations Research, https://doi. org/10.1007/s10479-014-1647-x.
  • 6陈义友,张锦,曾倩,等. 最后一公里配送服务选择均衡问题[J/OL]. 计算机集成制造系统, http://www. cnki. net/kcms/detail/11.3619.TP.20151016.1050.018. html.
  • 7WANG X, ZHAN L, RUAN J, et al. How to choose“last mile”delivery modes for E-fulfillment[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ 2014/417129.
  • 8CHEN Y, ZHAO X. Decision bias in capacity allocation games with uncertain demand[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2014, 24(4): 634-646.
  • 9CAI W, CHEN Y. Intertemporal pricing with boundedly rational consumers[J]. Journal of Revenue & Pricing Management, 2012, 11(4): 421-452.
  • 10HUANG T, ALLON G, BASSAMBOO A. Bounded rationality in service systems[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2013, 15(2): 263-279.

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部