“~应”“伊~”等并非附加式双音词

On the Non-Affix Nature of-Ying and Yi- Characters in Disyllable Words

就学者新说中古诗歌中＂伊＂＂於＂＂为＂＂试＂等是词头,＂应＂＂已＂＂云＂＂来＂＂其＂＂取＂等为词尾的观点,文章从宏观与微观角度作细致准确研究,论定它们都不是附加式构词。得出结论为：＂伊~＂或表肯定和强调语气,或为判断系词;＂於＂为＂於乎＂之省,＂为~＂为泛义动词;＂试~＂或为动词＂尝试＂,或为副词＂姑且＂;＂~应＂为动词＂应当＂;＂~已＂或是＂以＂的通假,或为副词＂已经＂;＂~云＂,或是动词＂说＂,或为＂运＂的通假;＂~来＂为助词;＂其＂为助词,＂载＂是＂才＂的通假;＂~取＂为泛义动词。

Some scholars held that yi-, yu-, wei-, shi- are prefixes and-ying,-yi,-yun,-lai,-qi,-qu are suffixes, as used in ancient poems. This paper, however, proved that they are not disyllable word affixations.With a macro and micro analysis, this paper found that yi- indicates affirmation and emphasis,or is a judgemental copula; yu- is the ellipsis of ＂yu hu＂; wei- is a general verb; shi- is the same as the verb of ＂chang shi＂or the adverb of ＂gu qie＂;-ying is the same as the verb of ＂ying dang＂;-yi is an interchangeable word of ＂yi＂ or the same as the adverb of ＂yi jing＂;-yun is the same as the verb of ＂shuo＂ or an interchangeable word of ＂yun＂;-lai and-qi are auxiliary word;-zai is an interchangeable word of ＂cai＂, and-qu is a general verb.