摘要
向魔鬼出卖灵魂以换取知识和青春的炼金术士浮士德,已成为西方文学中一个经久不衰的人物形象。几百年来,诸多作品都围绕浮士德这一形象展开,其中马洛的《浮士德博士的悲剧》和歌德的《浮士德》就是其中的佼佼者。若按亚里士多德和朱光潜的悲剧理论来解读,《浮士德博士的悲剧》与《浮士德》两部作品的悲剧起因、净化作用以及生命力感等都不相同,其在悲剧性方面存在明显差异。
German alchemist Fustus who sold his soul to the devil in exchange for knowledge and youth has become a long-lasting ifgure in Western literal history. For hundreds of years, a lot of writers have written numerous works on Fustus, among which Christopher Marlow’s Doctor Faustus and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s Faustus are two of the best ones. According to Aristotle’s and Zhu Guangqian’s theories on tragedy, the two works differ greatly in tragic courses, catharsic effect and life-force, which leads to their difference in the tragicalness.
出处
《苏州教育学院学报》
2014年第6期62-65,共4页
Journal of Suzhou College of Education
