期刊文献+

手助腹腔镜与全腹腔镜在右半结肠癌根治术中应用的前瞻性病例对照研究 被引量:12

Prospective case control study on the hand-assistant laparoscopic and total laparoscopic radical right colectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨手助腹腔镜与全腹腔镜在右半结肠癌根治术中的应用价值,对比分析两种术式的优劣,为术式选择提供客观依据。方法 316例右半结肠癌患者分别采用手助腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术(手助腹腔镜组,n=167)和全腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术(全腹腔镜组,n=149)行右半结肠癌根治术。分析指标包括手术时长、术中出血量、术后疼痛级别、术后引流量、切口美容评分、住院时间、住院费用及并发症比率等。结果手术时长、术中出血量及术后引流量手助腹腔镜组明显低于全腹腔镜组,差异有显著性(P<0.05);术后胃肠功能恢复时间手助腹腔镜组高于全腹腔镜组,差异有显著性(P<0.05);并发症比率、住院时间及住院费用两组间比较差异无显著性(P>0.05);术后疼痛级别手助腹腔镜组高于全腹腔镜组,差异有显著性(P<0.05);切口美容评分全腹腔镜组高于手助腹腔镜组,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论手助腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术在手术时长、术中出血量及术后引流量等方面具有优势,切口美容评分、术后疼痛程度及术后胃肠功能恢复时间全腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术优于手助腹腔镜术式,对于操作熟练的术者,可优先选用全腹腔镜操作。 【Objective】To compare the clinical outcomes between hand-assistant laparoscopic radical right colectomy and total laparoscopic radical right colectomy. 【Methods】316 patients diagnosed as right colic cancer received hand-assistant laparoscopic radical right colectomy or total laparoscopic radical right colectomy. The operation durations, bleeding volumes, postoperative pain scores, postoperative draining volumes, recovery time of gastrointestinal function, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, postoperative complications and cosmetic satisfactory scores were compared between the two approaches. 【Results】The operation duration, bleeding volume, postoperative draining volume in hand-assistant laparoscopic group were lower than total laparoscopic group(P〈0.05); The recovery time of gastrointestinal function of hand-assistant laparoscopic group was longer than total laparoscopic group(P〉0.05); The hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, postoperative complications were no significantly differences between the two groups(P〈0.05). Postoperative pain scores were higher in hand-assistant group(P〈0.05). The cosmetic satisfactory scores in total laparoscopic group were higher than in hand assistant laparoscopic group(P〈0.05).【Conclusion】The operation duration, bleeding volume, postoperative draining volume in hand-assistant laparoscopic radical right colectomy were better than total laparoscopic radical right colectomy. The cosmetic satisfactory scores, recovery time of gastrointestinal function, postoperative pain scores and postoperative complications of total laparoscopic radical right colectomy are better. The total laparoscopic radical right colectomy should be recommended for experienced operators. The hand-assistant laparoscopic radical right colectomy may be selected for patients who need to control the operation time or the cosmetic demand is poor.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 北大核心 2015年第2期113-116,共4页 China Journal of Endoscopy
基金 辽宁省科技厅科学事业公益研究基金(项目编号:2013001008)
关键词 右半结肠癌 腹腔镜手术 手助腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术 全腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术 right colic cancer laparoscopic operation hand-assistant laparoscopic radical right colectomy total laparoscopic radical right colectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1KAWAHARA H, WATANABE K, USHIGOME T, et al. Umbili- cal incision laparoscopic surgery with one assist port for anterior resection[J]. Dig Surg, 2010, 27(5): 364-366.
  • 2ADAIR J, GROMSKI MA, LIM RB, et al. Single-incision la- paroscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2010, 53(11): 1549-1554.
  • 3SAMALAVICIUS NE, GUPTA RK, DULSKAS A, et al. Clinical outcomes of 103 hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries for left-sided colon and rectal cancer: single institutional review[J]. Ann Coloproctol, 2013, 29(6): 225-230.
  • 4WATERS JA, GUZMAN M J, FAJARDO AD, et al. Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a safe alternative to convention- al laparoscopy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2010, 53(11): 1467-1472.
  • 5BAILEY MB, DAVENPORT DL, VARGAS HD, et al. Longer operative time: deterioration of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 57 (5): 616-622.
  • 6FISCON V, PORTALE G, FRIGO F, et al. Laparoscopic resec- tion of colorectal cancer: matched comparison in elderly and younger patients[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2010, 14(4): 323-327.
  • 7PARK IJ, CHOI GS, LIM KH, et al. Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessonsfrom 1,000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J]. Surg En- dosc, 2009, 23(4): 839-846.
  • 8ROTHOLTZ NA, BUN ME, TESSIO M, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy: medial versus lateral approach [J]. Surg Laparosc En- dose Percutan Tech, 2009, 19(1): 43-47.
  • 9BERTELSEN CA, BOLS B, INGEHOLM P, et al. Can the qual- ity of colonic surgery be improved by standardization of surgical technique with complete mesocolic excision [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2011, 13(10): 1123-1129.
  • 10RIMONDA R, AREZZO A, GARRONE C, et al. Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system vs harmonic scalpel in colorectal laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2009, 52(4): 657-661.

同被引文献101

引证文献12

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部