期刊文献+

全麻机械通气下俯卧位对患者肺换气功能的影响 被引量:13

Effects of prone position on pulmonary gas exchange during mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价全麻机械通气下俯卧位对患者肺换气功能的影响.方法 根据体位分为择期全麻下行俯卧位腰椎手术患者组(俯卧位组,n=30)和行仰卧位手术患者组(仰卧位组,n=30),年龄30~ 64岁,性别不限,BMI 19~ 30 kg/m^2,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级.全麻诱导气管插管后行机械通气,采用全凭静脉麻醉维持,2组分别于预充氧前10 min(T0)、插入气管导管后10 min(仰卧位变为俯卧位即刻)(T1)、45 min(T2)、90 min(T3)、拔除气管导管前5 min(俯卧位变为仰卧位前即刻)(T4)及拔除气管导管后15 min(T5)时,采集桡动脉血样行血气分析,记录PaO2和PaCO2,计算肺泡-动脉血氧分压差(A-aDO2);并于T1、T4和T5时,行胸部数字X线摄影,观察肺部改变.结果 与仰卧位组比较,俯卧位组T1-4时PaO2升高,A-aDO2降低(P<0.05);2组患者PaCO2及T0和T5时上述各指标比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组不同时点肺部数字X线摄影未见肺不张.结论 全麻机械通气下,俯卧位肺换气功能优于仰卧位. Objective To evaluate the effects of the prone position on pulmonary gas exchange during mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia.Methods Thirty patients scheduled for elective spine surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia (group prone,n =30),30 patients scheduled for elective spine surgery in the supine position under general anesthesia (group supine,n=30),aged 30-64 yr,with body mass index of 19-30 kg/m^2,of ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ,were enrolled in the study.After induction of general anesthesia,the patients were mechanically ventilated.Anesthesia was maintained with total intravenous anesthesia.At 10 min before pre-oxygenation (T0),10 min after intubation (immediately after the patients were moved from the supine to the prone position) (T1),45 and 90 min after intubation (T2,3),5 min before extubation (immediately before supine position to the prone position) (T4),and 15 min after extubation (T5),arterial blood samples were taken for blood gas analysis,and PaO2 and PaCO2 were recorded.Alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (A-aDO2) was calculated.Digital radiography was performed and the changes of the lung were observed.Results Compared with supine group,PaO2 was significantly increased and A-aDO2 was decreased at T1-4 in prone group.There was no significant difference in PaCO2,and PaO2 and A-aDO2 at T0 and T5 between the two groups.The results of digital radiography showed no atelectasis at different time points in either group.Conclusion Pulmonary gas exchange in the prone position is superior to that in the supine position during mechanical ventilationunder general anesthesia.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期80-83,共4页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
关键词 俯卧位 呼吸功能试验 肺不张 麻醉 全身 Prone position Respiratory function tests Atelectasis Anesthetsia,general
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Gattinoni L, Tognoni G, Pesenti A, et al. Effect of prone posi- tioning on the survival of patients with acute respiratory failure [J]. N Engl J Med,2001,345(8) :568-573.
  • 2Lumb AB, Nunn JF. Respiratory function and ribcage contribution to ventilation in body positions commonly used during anesthesia [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1991,73 (4) : 422-426.
  • 3Pelosi P, Croci M, Calappi E, et al. The prone positioning during general anesthesia minimally affects respiratory mechanics while improving functional residual capacity and increasing oxygen tension [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1995,80 ( 5 ) : 955-960.
  • 4周玲,李娟,柴小青.俯卧位腰椎手术患者压力控制通气和容量控制通气效果的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2013,33(11):1365-1367. 被引量:8
  • 5Edmark L, Kostova-Aherdan K, Enlund M, et al. Optimal oxy- gen concentration during induction of general anesthesia[ J]. An- esthesiology, 2003,98 ( 1 ) : 28-33.
  • 6Edmark L, Auner U, Enlund M, et al. Oxygen concentration and characteristics of progressive atelectasis formation during an- aesthesia [ J ]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2011,55 ( 1 ) : 75-81.
  • 7Whalen FX, Gajic O, Thompson GB, et al. The effects of the alveolar recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on arterial oxygenation during laparoscopic bariatric sur- gery[ J] .Anesth Analg,2006,102( 1 ) :298-305.
  • 8Rothen HU, Neumann P, Berglund JE, et al. Dynamics of re-expansion of atelectasis during general anaesthesia[ J]. Br J An- aesth, 1999,82(4) :551-556.
  • 9Nyren S, Radell P, Lindahl SG, et al. Lung ventilation and perfusion in prone and supine postures with reference to anesthe-tized and mechanically ventilated healthy volunteers [ J ]. Anes- thesiology, 2010,112 ( 3 ) : 682-687.

二级参考文献4

  • 1Gupta SD, Kundu SB, Ghose T, et al.A comparison between vol- ume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in pro- viding better oxygenation in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Anaesth,2012,56(3) : 276-282.
  • 2Gatward JJ, Cook TM, Seller C, et al. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia, 2008,63 (10) : 1224-1130.
  • 3Lakind JS, Holgate ST, Ownby DR, et al. A critical review of the use of Clara cell secretory protein (CC16) as a biomarker of acute or chronic pulmonary effects. Biomarkers, 2007, 12(5) :445-467.
  • 4冯继峰,郑剑秋,周蜀克,兰江丽.腹腔镜手术患儿压力控制通气和容量控制通气效果的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2011,31(2):220-222. 被引量:5

共引文献7

同被引文献126

引证文献13

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部