期刊文献+

随机与非随机研究治疗效果证据的比较 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
出处 《美国医学会杂志(中文版)》 2002年第4期205-208,218,共5页 The Journal of the American Medical Association(Chinese Edition)
  • 相关文献

同被引文献23

  • 1杨小波,老膺荣,吴蕾.糖尿病中医药治疗性文献系统评价[J].浙江中医杂志,2004,39(9):389-391. 被引量:11
  • 2汪涛,冯学山,吴擢春.非随机化医学研究中风险比的一种估计方法[J].中国卫生统计,2004,21(5):293-296. 被引量:7
  • 3赖世隆.中医药临床疗效评价因果关联推断的探讨[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2005,25(4):293-296. 被引量:17
  • 4Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med, 2000, 342(25): 1887-1892.
  • 5Britton A, McKee M, Black N, et al. Choosing between randomized and non-randomised studies: A systematic review. Health Technology Assessment, 1998, 2(13): 1-124.
  • 6Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 2000, 11(5): 550-560.
  • 7Horwitz RI, Viscoli CM, Clemens JD, et al. Developing improved observational methods for evaluating therapeutic effectiveness. Am J Med, 1990, 89(5): 630-638.
  • 8de Almeida Neto AC, Chen TF. When pharmacotherapeutic recommendations may lead to the reverse effect on physician decisionmaking. Pharm World Sci, 2008, 30(1): 3-8.
  • 9Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ, 1996, 312(7040): 1215-1218.
  • 10Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational and randomized controlled trials. N Engl JMed, 2000, 342: 1878-1886.

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部