奇虎360诉腾讯垄断案最高院终审判决之启示

Revelation of the Supreme Court's Final Judgment of Monopoly Case Qihoo vs. Tencent

最高人民法院于2014年10月16日作出奇虎360公司起诉腾讯公司滥用市场支配地位案件之终审判决,意味着历时四年之久的中国互联网反垄断第一案"3Q"大战落下帷幕。虽然对于判决结果仍存在争议,但是长达几万字的终审判决书中所蕴含的反垄断审判的基本原则和原理值得分析和探究。在判决书中,最高人民法院明确了相关市场边界非常模糊时不必刻意追求清晰界定相关市场、原告对相关市场的界定承担举证责任、SSNIP测试方法谨慎适用于产品差异化明显且主要为非价格竞争形式的领域、相关市场界定的一般方法、双边盈利市场对于相关市场界定的影响以及搭售的法律构成要件等众多在反垄断审判实践领域具有较高价值的问题。

On October 16, 2014, the Supreme Court issued the final judgment of the case Qihoo v. Tencent,which is about Tencent＇s abuse of market dominant position and China＇s Internet first anti-monoply case ＂3Q＂ war ended after four years. Although the verdict remains controversial, the basic principles and logic in the final judgment with tens of thousands of words of the anti-monopoly trial are worth analyzing and studying. The Supreme People＇s court defines when the related market boundary is very vague we need not deliberately pursue a clear definition of the relevant market; the plaintiff should bear the burden of proof in the definition of the relevant market. These are of high value in the anti-monopoly trial practical field such as SSNIP test method is cautiously applicable to obviously different product and in the field of main non-price competition form, a general method for defining the relevant market, the impact of bilateral profit market on the definition of the relevant market, and tying the legal elements.