期刊文献+

78例乳腺导管内癌临床分析

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast(Report of 78 cases)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同肿块大小的乳腺导管内癌(ductal carcinoma in situ,DCIS)的临床、病理特点。方法回顾性分析河北大学附属医院2011年2月至2013年9月收治的78例DCIS病例特点,以肿块大小1.0 cm及3.0 cm为分界点,进行对比分析。结果肿块≤1.0cm及肿块1.0-3.0cm临床特征差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),而肿块〉3.0 cm与前2者相比差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),多表现为微浸润,多灶性比例高以及前哨淋巴结阳性比例高。DCIS与浸润性导管癌(infiltrating ductal carcinoma,IDC)进行病理学指标的差异性分析,ER、PR、Ki67阳性表达相对低、HER-2阳性表达相对高(P〈0.05),差异有统计学意义,而IDC与肿块〉3.0 cm的DCIS进行分析,各指标差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论肿块〉3.0 cm的DCIS是一种特殊类型的癌,更具有侵袭性,生物学特点更接近于IDC,治疗推荐按IDC方式处理。 Objective To explore the clinical and pathological characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS) with tumor size examination. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 78 DCIS cases in Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University from Feb. 2011 to Sep. 2013. A comparative analysis was conducted with the cut-off points of 1.0cm and 3.0cm tumor size. Results When tumor size≤1.0cm and tumor size between 1.0-3.0cm, the clinical characteristics had no significant difference, when tumor size〉3.0cm, the characteristics were significantly different from the above two(P〈0.05) shown as micro infiltration, high multifocal proportion, and high sentinel lymph node positive rate. The variance analysis of pathological indicators of DCIS and IDC showed that the positive expression of ER, PR, Ki67 was relatively low, while the positive expression of HER-2 was relatively high(P〈0.05), this difference was significant. When tumor size 〉3cm, all the indicators had no significant difference. Conclusion When tumor size3.0 cm, the DCIS is more aggressive and its biology characteristics are similarly to IDC. The IDC treatment is recommended.
出处 《医学研究与教育》 CAS 2015年第1期26-30,共5页 Medical Research and Education
关键词 乳腺导管内癌 乳腺癌 诊断 DCIS breast cancer diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献44

  • 1黄宝俊,徐惠绵,李凯,王怀宇,张昊,田大彤.联合检测多基因在乳腺癌组织中的表达及其临床意义[J].中国普通外科杂志,2005,14(4):247-252. 被引量:11
  • 2李美蓉,范松青,张利群,蒋谊.乳腺癌激素受体和癌基因的表达及临床意义[J].中国医师杂志,2006,8(1):34-37. 被引量:5
  • 3封敏,黄艳春,赵锋.乳腺癌组织中C-erbB-2基因蛋白的表达及其意义[J].新疆医科大学学报,2006,29(10):976-978. 被引量:2
  • 4Mylonas I, Makovitzky J, Jeschke U, et al. Expression of Her2/neu, steroid receptors ( ER and PR) , Ki67 and p53 in invasive mammary ductal carcinoma associated with ductal carcinoma in situ ( DCIS ) versus invasive breast cancer alone [J]. Anticancer Res, 2005, 25(3A) :1719-1723.
  • 5Daly MB. Tamoxifen in ductal carcinoma in situ [ J ]. Seminars Oncol, 2006, 33(6) : 647 -649.
  • 6Menezes MV, Cestari AL, Almeida O, et al. Protein expression of C-erbB-2 and p53 in normal ducts, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma of the same breast [ J ]. Sao Paulo Med J, 2006, 124(3) : 121 -124.
  • 7Bhatavdekar JM, Patel DD, Shah NG, et al. Prognostic singnificancer of immunohistochemically localized biomarkers in stage Ⅱ and stage Ⅲ breast cancer: a multivariate analysis [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2000, 7(4) : 305 -311.
  • 8Lawson JS, Field AS, Tran DD, et al. Breast cancer incidence and estrogen receptor alpha in normal mammary tissuean epidemiologic study among Japanese women in Japan and Hawaii[J]. Int J Cancer, 2002, 97(5) : 685 -687.
  • 9Collins LG, Sehnitt SJ. Her-2 protein over expression in estrogen receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast : frequency and implications for tamoxifen therapy [ J ]. Modern Pathol, 2005, 18(5) : 615 -620.
  • 10Nofech-Mozes S, Spayne J, Rakovitch E, et al. Prognostic and predictive molecular markers in DCIS [ J ]. Adv Anat Pathol, 2005, 12(5) : 256 -264.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部