期刊文献+

美国重塑教育博士改革行动及其启示 被引量:2

Reform of Ed.D. Education in the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 进入21世纪以来,美国发起了旨在解决两种学位趋同、彰显教育博士培养特色、创新学位制度的"重塑"教育博士系列改革行动。首先是由美国部分大学率先实施的重新设计教育博士项目的改革行动,在教育博士培养目标、招生对象、课程设置、学位论文要求等方面,探索彰显教育博士这一专业学位特色的培养模式,开启了美国重塑教育博士改革行动的帷幕;其次是由卡内基教学促进会联合25所大学共同发起的全国性重新评估教育博士卡内基行动,以重新评估为手段,通过项目联盟、协作设计实验等举措,共同探索特色鲜明的新的教育博士培养模式;三是由哈佛大学启动实施的创设教育领导博士专业学位的改革行动,丰富了美国博士学位结构,创建出美国新的教育博士类型,进一步拓展了教育博士教育发展的空间。 Since the beginning of twenty-first Century, in order to solve two degree convergence, show the characteristics of doctor of education(Ed.D.), and Innovation the academic degree system, American launched remodeling doctor of education series reform action. The first is the project of the redesign doctor of education that American part of the university launched, in aspects of training objectives, admissions object, curriculum, dissertation requirements, exploring the cultivating the mode of doctor of education to highlight the characteristics of this professional degree, opening America remodeling doctor of education reform action curtain;The second is that the Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate by the Carnegie Foundation for Teaching and Learning and 25 University jointly launched, reevaluation as the means, through the project alliance, cooperative design experiment measures, to jointly explore the distinct characteristics of the new education doctoral cultivation mode; the third is creating Doctor of Education Leadership (Ed.L.D.) by Harvard University, to enrich American doctoral degree structure, and create a new type of American doctoral education, further expand the development of doctoral education space.
作者 韩延伦
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期32-47,共16页 Studies in Foreign Education
基金 山东省研究生教育创新计划项目"专业学位研究生创新能力培养定位及其培养体系建设研究"(项目编号:SDYY13091)
关键词 重塑教育博士 教育博士学位 博士培养 学位制度创新 remodeling doctor of education doctor of education education doctoral cultivation The degree of system innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1ARTHUR LEVINE.Education Researchers[R/OL].[2007-10-15].http://www.edschools.org/Educating Researchers/Educating_researchers.pdf.
  • 2THOMAS HOFFER,etal.Doctorate recipients from United States universities:summary report2005[R].Chicago:National Opinion Research Center,2006:6-9.
  • 3Ed.D.program philosophy[EB/OL].[2011-08-14].http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/leader-ship_policy_and_organizations/graduate_and_professional-programs/edd.xml.
  • 4Courtenay,C..Eliminating the confusion over the Ed.D.and Ph.D.in colleges and schools of edu-cation[J].Innovative higher Education,1988,13(1):11-16.
  • 5CLIFFORD,G.,GUTHRIE,J..Education School:A Brief for Professional Education[M].Chica-go:University of Chicago Press,1988:149.
  • 6JEFF ARCHER.Some Ed.D Programs Adopting Practical Approach[J].Education Week,2005,25(15):8.
  • 7ARTHUR LEVINE.Educating school leaders[EB/OL].[2010-12-02].http://www.edschools.org/pdf/Final313.pdf.
  • 8academic-program[EB/OL].[2011-05-01].http://rossier.usc.edu/academic/edd/academic-pro-gram.html.
  • 9MARSH,D.&DEMBO,M..Rethinking School Leadership Programs:The USC Ed.D.Programin Perspective[J].Peabody Journal of Education,2009,(1):69-85.
  • 10SMREKAR,C.&MCGRAER,K..From curricular alignment to the culminating project:the Pea-body college Ed.D.capstone[J].Peabody Journal of Education,2009,(1):48-60.

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部