期刊文献+

教育改革与发展需要教育评估发挥更大作用 被引量:3

The Reform and Development of Education Need the Educational Evaluation to Play a Great Role
下载PDF
导出
摘要 上海的教育改革与发展需要教育决策者、教育管理者、教育者、教育对象以及社会各界群策群力、通力合作才能形成蒸蒸日上的良好局面,其中,教育评估是教育管理系统中的重要组成部分。党的十八三中全会明确提出要"管办评"分离,在这种背景下加强教育评估与提升教育评估机构能力建设具有更为现实的意义。教育评估机构应该做好教育决策者的决策咨询工作、做好教育管理者的管理服务工作、做好办学者的教育评估工作、加强教育评估机构系统自身建设工作。在坚持有所作为的同时,还应有所不为。特别是对自身的认识要到位、对今后的发展目标与路径要清晰、对借鉴西方经验与立足本土化的大方向要有清醒的认识。 The reform and development of Shanghai education need a cooperation of educa- tional discussion makers, educational administers, educational performers and educational objec- tives. All parts should put together and then a flourishing appearance will be shown to people's eyes. Among these parts, educational evaluation plays an vital role. It was pointed out in the Third Session of the 18 Central Committee of CCP that the administration, implementation and evaluation should be separated. Under this background, enhancing educational evaluation and im- proving the capacity of educational evaluation institutions are of great importance. Educational e- valuation institutions should provide consultation for educational decision makers, provide service to educational administrators, provide educational evaluation to educators. It should also pay at- tention to self-construction. Educational evaluation institutions should do selectively the only things they can and should do, they should have a clear understanding of their own and grasp accurately their developing goal and path, they should have an appropriate use of western expe- rience and enhance the localization.
作者 周益斌
出处 《上海教育评估研究》 2015年第1期54-57,65,共5页 Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
基金 上海高校青年教师培养资助计划研究成果
关键词 教育评估 教育改革与发展 教育系统 教育决策 教育管理 Education evaluation Reform and development of education Education sys-tem Education decision Education management
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献7

  • 1吴长莉,赵晓兰,张国华.高等教育评估对高等教育主体的影响[J].现代企业教育,2007(01X):71-71. 被引量:2
  • 2教育部高等教育评估中心简介[DB/OL].(2000-01-10)[2009-01-10]http://baike.baidu.com/view/238507.htm.
  • 3赫钦斯著,姚柏春译.教育现势与前瞻[M].北京:今日世界出版社,1976:110.
  • 4Jaspers, Karl. The Idea of the University[M]..London: Peter Owen Ltd. 1965: 19.
  • 5Kerr, Clark. The Great Education[M]. Albany, N.Y. Press, 1991: 47. Transformation in Higher State University of New York.
  • 6[美]约翰·S·布鲁贝克 王承绪 译.高等教育哲学[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001.13-18.
  • 7于东红,张静.我国高等教育评估中的主要矛盾及其解决路径[J].中国电子教育,2006(3):20-24. 被引量:3

共引文献5

同被引文献23

  • 1袁益民.以科学发展观和人文绩效观引领学校评估实践(上)[J].中小学管理,2005(4):14-15. 被引量:4
  • 2唐霞.英国高等教育质量保证署新院校审核述评[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2007(3):92-95. 被引量:4
  • 3The Quality Assurance for Agency Higher Education.Our purposes, values and standards[EB/OL]. [2016-03-01]. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/about us/purposes.asp.html.
  • 4Institutional review of higher education institutions in England and Northern Ireland: Operational description [EB/OL]. [2016-03-01 ].http://www.qaa.uk/Publications/ InformationAndGuidance/Documents/IRENI-operationald.pdf.html.
  • 5Summary of institutional review in England and Northern Ireland [ EB/OL ]. [ 2016-03-01 ].http://www.qaa.ae.uk/en/ Publications/Documents/IR-summarv.odf.html.
  • 6The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Higher Education Review:A handbook for providers [Z].2013: 22-24.
  • 7The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Institutional Review of Higher Education Institutional in England and Northern Ireland: A handbook for higher education providers[ Z ].2012:10-12.
  • 8The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Higher Education Review:A handbook for providers [Z]. 2013: 30-35.
  • 9The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Higher Education Review:a handbook for QAA subscribers and providers with access to funding from HEFCE undergoing review in 2014-15[Z].2014:12-16.
  • 10葛大汇.教育评估中介的组织属性与法理分析——论教育评估机构面临的问题与改革方向[J].上海教育科研,2008(12):33-36. 被引量:9

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部