期刊文献+

基于关联系数标准差融合的置信规则库规则约简方法 被引量:5

Rule Reduction Approach to Belief Rule Base Using Correlation Coefficient and Standard Deviation Integrated Method
原文传递
导出
摘要 为解决置信规则库中由于前提属性数量过多引起的"组合爆炸"问题,前人已经提出了许多维度约简的规则约简方法.然而,这些方法在算法实现的难易程度、筛选属性的合理性、规则约简的数量和决策推理的准确性上难以都取得理想的效果,因此本文基于关联系数标准差法提出了新的规则约简方法,其核心思想是根据关联权重来约简置信规则库.本文还引入装甲装备体系作为分析实例,并重点在特殊方案和一般方案两种情形下分析基于关联系数标准差规则约简方法的适用性.实验结果表明,本文所提出的方法的约简结果具有较低效用偏差和较高相似度. To solve the problem of combinatorial explosion in belief rule base (BRB) caused by too many anteced- ent attributes, many rule reduction methods that adopt dimensionality reduction techniques are proposed. However, these methods cannot simultaneously achieve the desired results, namely algorithm implementation, reasonability of filtering attributes, the number of reduced rule and the accuracy of reasoning. Hence, a new rule reduction method that uses correlation coefficient and standard deviation integrated method is proposed. The kernel method is based on the coefficient weight for reducing BRB. An armored system of systems also in- troduced to analyze the applicability of the rule reduction method using the correlation coefficient and standard deviation integrated method. The experimental results show that the BRB, which is reduced by the proposed method, has lower utility deviation and higher similarity.
出处 《信息与控制》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期21-28,37,共9页 Information and Control
基金 国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目(70925004) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71371053) 国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(61300026 61300104) 福建省教育厅科技项目(JA13036) 福州大学科技发展基金资助项目(2014-XQ-26)
关键词 关联系数标准差 维度约简 规则约简 关联权重 置信规则库 correlation coefficient andstar dard deviation dimensionality reduction rule reduction correlation weight belief rule base
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Yang J B, Liu J, Wang J, et al. Belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning approach-RIMER [ J ]. IEEE Transac- tions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 2006, 36 (2) : 266 - 285.
  • 2Dempster A P. A generalization of Bayesian inference [ J ]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Methodological, 1968, 30 (2) : 205 - 247.
  • 3Shafer G. A mathematical theory of evidence[ M]. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 4Huang C L, Yong K. Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications: A state-of-art survey [ M ]. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Ver- lag, 1981.
  • 5Zadeh L Z. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3) : 338 -353.
  • 6Sun R. Robust reasoning: Integration rule-based and similarity-based reasoning[ J ]. Artificial Intelligence, 1995, 75 (2) : 241 -295.
  • 7Liu J, Yang J B, Ruan D, et al. Self-tuning of fuzzy belief rule bases for engineering system safety analysis [ J ]. Annals of Operations Re- search, 2008, 163(1) : 143 -168.
  • 8Yang J B, Liu J, Xu D L, et al. Optimizationmodel for training belief-rule-based systems[ J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cy- bernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 2007, 37 (4) : 569 - 585.
  • 9Zhou Z J, Hu C H, Yang J B, et al. Online updating belief-rule-based system for pipeline leak detection under expert intervention [ J ]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(4) : 7700 -7709.
  • 10周志杰.置信规则库在线建模方法与故障预测[D].西安:第二炮兵工程学院,2010.

共引文献120

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部