期刊文献+

改良TST术与Milligan-Morgan术治疗混合痔的临床对比观察 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨改良TST术治疗混合痔的临床疗效。方法选择40例Ⅱ~Ⅳ度混合痔患者,随机均分为2组(n=20),试验组采用改良TST术治疗,对照组采用Milligan-Morgan术治疗,对比观察2组患者的疗效、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、恢复工作时间、术后并发症(术后出血、术后肛门水肿、疼痛、肛门坠胀)、第1次排便情况及总体满意度。结果2组在疗效、肛门坠胀方面比较差异无统计学意义,而在手术时间、住院时间、恢复工作时间、总体满意度及术中出血量、术后出血、肛门水肿、疼痛、排便情况方面,试验组显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论改良TST术治疗混合痔疗效确切,术后并发症发生率低,疗程短,患者满意度高,是一种具有较高临床应用和推广价值的手术。 Objective Investigate the clinical therapeutic effect of the improved TST in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids. Methods Forty cases withⅡ-Ⅳdegree mixed hemorrhoids were divided into two groups randomly(n=20).Each group has twenty cases.Cases in trial group received the treatment of improved TST,and cases in controlled group received the treatment of Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.A comparison was done between the two groups in terms of the following items:the curative rate, operation time,the volume of blood loss in operation,postoperative hospitalization time, rehabilitation time, and postoperative complications such as postoperative bleeding,anal bulge,the postoperative anal pain,tenesmus sensation of anus,stool after the operation,patient’s satisfactory degree Results There was no signiifcant difference between the two groups in the curative rate,and tenesmus sensation of anus.The trial group surpass the controlled group in the aspects of operation time,postoperative hospitalization time,rehabilitation time,patient’ satisfactory degree and the volume blood of loss in operation,postoperative bleeding、anal bulge,the postoperative anal pain、stool after the operation.There was signiifcant difference(P〈0.05). Conclusion For the treatment of the mixed hemorrhoids,the improved TST showed good curative effect,few postoperative complications,short postoperative stay,high patient’s satisfactory degree,which is worthy in clinical application.
作者 孙燕 谷云飞
出处 《当代医学》 2015年第8期75-77,共3页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 改良TST术 MILLIGAN-MORGAN术 混合痔 The improved TST Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy Mixed hemorrhoids
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1吴阶平 裘法祖.黄家驷外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.1108-1109.
  • 2Longo A.Treatment of haemorrhoid disease by reduction of muscosa and haem orrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device:a new procedure[A].Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery[C]. Rome : 1998: 774-784.
  • 3Rowse]l M ,Betlo M,Hemingway DM.Circumferential mu-cosectomy(stap]ed haemorrhoidectomy)versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy:randomized controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2000,555(9206): 779-781.
  • 4姚礼庆,钟芸诗,孙益红,戈少云,刘厚宝,郑烈伟.吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术治疗重度痔疮的3年疗效评价[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2004,7(2):120-123. 被引量:98
  • 5Ripetti V,Caricato M,Arullani A.ffectal perforation,retropneumoperit oneum,and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids~report of a case and subsequent considerations[J].Dis Colon Rectum, 2002,45(2): 268-270.
  • 6关瑞剑,赵江宁,罗湛滨,张思奋,范小华,任东林.混合痔PPH术后5年随访分析[J].结直肠肛门外科,2009,15(4):268-269. 被引量:24
  • 7痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2119
  • 8Shalaby B,Desoky A.Bandomized Clinical Trial of Stapled Versus Mitligan-Morgan Haemorrhoidectomy[J].BrJ Surg,200],88(6):1049- 1053.
  • 9郁宝铭,林建江,吴唯勤.微粒化纯化的黄酮成分治疗痔急性发作的多中心自身对照临床研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2004,19(12):722-724. 被引量:43
  • 10Thompson WHF.The nature of haemorrhoids[J].Br J Surg,1975,62 (7):542-552.

二级参考文献28

  • 1赵东兵,高纪东,毕建军,邵永孚,赵平.T1和T2期直肠癌淋巴结转移特点及预后[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(3):235-237. 被引量:13
  • 2李国华,廖旺娣,刘丕,王健,吕农华,王崇文.大肠癌1561例临床病理分析[J].中华消化杂志,2006,26(8):523-526. 被引量:24
  • 3陈静,杨大业,涂巍,孙玉华,梁健,董明.老年人大肠癌152例临床分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2006,25(10):755-756. 被引量:14
  • 4George J.Chang,MD,John M.et al.Are We Undertreating Rectal Cancer in the Elderly[J].Ann Surg,2007,246(2):215-221.
  • 5Alexander G.Heriot,Paris P.Tekkis,Jason J.Smith,et al.Prediction of Postoperative Mortality in Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer[M].Dis Colon Rectum,2006:11.
  • 6Latkauskas T,Rudinskaite G,Kurtinaitis J,et al.The impact of age on post-operative outcomes of colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment[J].BMC Cancer,2005,2(5):153.
  • 7Rasheed S,Bowley DM,Aziz O,et al.Can depth of tumour invasion predict lymph node positivity in patients undergoing resection for early rectal cancer? A comparative study between T1 and T2 cancers[J].Colorectal Dis,2008,10(3):231-238.
  • 8Chamlou R,Parc Y,Simon T,et al.Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer[J].Ann Surg,2007,246(6):916-921.
  • 9Pernicky M,Murin J,Labas P.Perioperative cardiovascular and noncardiovascular risk in patients with colorectal cancer[J].Bratisl Lek Listy,2007,108(6):246-250.
  • 10Arenal JJ,de Teresa G,Tinoco C,et al.Abdominal surgery in nonagenarians:short-term results[J].Surg Today,2007,37(12):1064-1067.

共引文献2464

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部