从英美实践来看我国参与国际法律事务的有效性问题被引量：13

The Issue of China's Effective Participation for International Legal Affairs:A Perspective of Comparing with the Practices of Both UK and US

原文传递

导出

摘要国家在参与国际法律规则的制定与形成过程中,应确保自身的参与是一种有效的参与,能够通过参与把本国利益融入相应国际法律规则之中。从中国参与联合国国际法委员会和国际法院的活动实践来看,与荚美国家的相关参与实践相比较,无论是在参与技术、参与时机还是最终的参与效果上,中国的表现均不理想。在今后参与国际法律事务的过程中,为保证自身参与的有效性,中国在参与技术、参与方式等方面都有必要加以改进和完善。 During the drafting and adopting process of international legal rules, in order to integrate their interests into the rules, the participating states should participate in the process effectively. Compared with the participating practices of both UK and US, China demonstrates its ineffectiveness in both the activities of International Law Commission and the activities of the International Court of Justice. In order to participating effectively, it is important for China to improve and enhance its participation performances.

作者宋杰

机构地区浙江工商大学法学院

出处《比较法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期148-159,共12页 Journal of Comparative Law

基金国家社科基金项目"国际法上的司法干涉问题研究"(项目号:13BFX145)的研究成果

关键词有效参与国际法律规则国家利益中国 effective participation international legal rules state interest China

分类号 D99 [政治法律—国际法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献13

1http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog3fac2db10100joSr.html,2014年2月18日最后访问.
2See Written Statement of the Government of the USA Concerning the Case of Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflicts, available at : http ://www. icj - cij. org/docket/files/93/8770.
3See Written Statement of the Government of the United Kingdom Concerning the Case of Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Aimed Conflicts, available at : http ://www. icj - cij. org/docket/files/93/8742, pdf.
4See Written Statement of the Government of the USA, Statement of the Government of the United Kingdom Concerning the Case of Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, available at : http ://www. iej - eij. org,/docket/files/95/8700, pdf.
5See Written Statement of the United States of America, Written State of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, available at: http://www, iej -cij. org/docket/index, php? pl =3&p2 =4&k =21&case = 141&code = kos&p3 = 1. 2014.
6http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/ceun/chn/zgylhg/flyty/ldlwjh/t348875.htm.2014年2月21日最后访问.
7http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/15611.pdf.2014年2月23日最后访问.
8http://www.tcj-eij.org/doeket/files/141/15702.pdfhttp://www.iej-cij.org/doekeUfiles/141/15704.pdf.2014年2月22日最后访问.
9"Thus, the scope of the principle of territorial integrity is confined to the sphere of relations between States. " See Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, I. C.J. Reports 2010, p. 437, para. 80.
10See Written Statement of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, pp. 86 - 87, paras. 5.8 - 5. 11, available at : http ://www. iej -eij. org/doeket/files/141/15638, pdf.

二级参考文献26

1See Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal) , ICJ Judgment of 20 July 2012.
2David J. Scheffer,International Judicial Intervention,Foreign Policy, No. 102 , 1996,pp. 3451.
3Andrea Birdsall,The International Politics of Judicial Intervention,Routledge,2009, p. 3.
4See Andrea Birdsall, The International Politics of Judicial Intervention, Routledge 2009, pp. 113141.
5Lorna McGregor, Military and Judicial Intervention The Way forward in Human Rights Enforcement? 12 Ind. Int'l Comp. L. Rev. ,20012002.
6See Andrea Birdsall, The International Politics of Judicial Intervention, Routledge 2009, pp. 113141.
7lBirdsall, Andrea,Judicial In- tervention Coming of Age? The Creation of the International Criminal Court, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association,TBA, Berlin, Germany, Jul 25, 2007.
8See Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (New Application : 1962) (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment, ICJ Reports 1970.
9See Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with Commentaries, Commentary to Article 42, para 2, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2001, Vol. 2, p. 117, p. 126.
10See South Africa Case, ICJ Reports 1966, pp. 3839.