期刊文献+

TIS电脑辅助阅片新技术在妇科宫颈疾病普查中的应用与临床意义 被引量:4

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨新柏氏电脑自动辅助阅片系统(Thin Prep imaging system,TIS)在大样本宫颈疾病普查中的临床应用价值。方法:选取2013年4月-2014年4月该院4 600例宫颈液基细胞涂片,第1次TIS电脑辅助阅片检查,间隔适当期后对相同的标本进行第2次单纯人工阅片检查,对两种阅片方法进行比较分析。对细胞学阳性病例进行阴道镜下多点取材活检,以病理学为金标准,对细胞学与病理组织活检结果进行对比分析。结果:用TIS每小时可筛查26.7张,而人工阅片只能筛查13.8张玻片,工作效率提高了93.5%。在4 600例宫颈液基细胞涂片中,TIS的细胞学阳性病例351例,总检出率为7.63%,其中ASC-US 226例,ASC-H 35例,LSIL 47例,HSIL 36例。人工阅片的细胞学阳性病例263例,总检出率为5.72%,其中ASC-US 176例,ASC-H 22例,LSIL 36例,HSIL 23例。TIS与人工阅片细胞学阳性结果比较,总检出率增加了33.40%,其中TIS的ASC-US、ASC-H、LSIL、HSIL阳性检出率比人工阅片分别增加了9.40%、58.33%、30.77%、56.00%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。以病理学为金标准,对细胞学与病理组织活检结果进行比较,TIS和人工阅片细胞学阳性病例和组织病理学符合率分别为90.53%和89.86%。虽然TIS结果呈上升趋势,但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:与单纯的人工阅片相比,电脑辅助阅片系统能明显缩短阅片时间,提高宫颈异常细胞的检出率,降低了假阴性率,是一种具有较高应用价值的子宫颈癌筛查技术。
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 2015年第10期1601-1603,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Duby JM,Di Furio MJ.Implementation of the Thin Prep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center[J].Cancer Cytopathol,2009,117(4):264.
  • 2Dziura B,Quinn S,Richard K.Performance of an imaging system vs.manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix[J].Acta Cytol,2006,50(3):309-311.
  • 3Boost T.A comparison of screening times between the ThinPrep Image and conventional cytology[J].Diagn Cytopathol,2009,37(9):661-664.
  • 4Biscotti CV,Dawson AE,Dziura B,et al.Assisted primary screening using the automated Thin Prep Imaging System[J].Am J Clin Pathol,2005,123(2):281-287.
  • 5杨琼娇,李平.电脑辅助阅片在宫颈细胞学筛查中的应用[J].临床医学,2013,33(10):34-35. 被引量:3
  • 6周东华,田杰,王夷黎,秦艳,平静,刘小燕,陈莹,范菊花.计算机辅助阅片与单纯人工阅片在宫颈液基细胞学诊断中对比观察[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2013,29(7):782-784. 被引量:7
  • 7Halford JA,Batty T,Boost T,et al.Comparison of the sensitivity of conventional cytology and the Thin Prep Imaging System for 1 083 biopsy confirmed high-grade squamous lesions[J].Diagn Cytopathol,2010,38(5):318-326.

二级参考文献13

  • 1张峰莉,张蔚,洛若愚.新伯氏液基薄层细胞学在宫颈病变筛查中的应用[J].实用诊断与治疗杂志,2007,21(11):830-832. 被引量:9
  • 2Kitchener H C, Blanks R, Dunn G, et al. Automation-assisted versus manual reading of cervical cytology ( MAVARIC ) : a ran- domised controlled trial [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2011,12 ( 1 ) : 56 - 64.
  • 3Wingo P A, Cardinez C J, Landis S H, et al. Long-term trends in cancer mortality in the United States, 1930 - 1998 [ J ]. Cancer, 2003,97 (12Suppl) : 3133 - 275.
  • 4Boost T. A comparison of screening times between the ThinPrep Imager and conventional cytology[J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2009,37 (9) :661 -4.
  • 5Lozano R. Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology[ J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2007,104( 1 ) : 134 - 8.
  • 6Dziura B, Quinn S, Richard K. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix [ J ]. Acta Cytol, 2006,50 ( 3 ) : 309 - 11.
  • 7Bolger N, Heffron C, Regan I, et al. Implementation and evalua- tion of a new automated interactive image analysis system[J]. Aeta Cytol, 2006,50(5) :483 -91.
  • 8Duby J M, DiFurio M J. Implementation of the ThinPrep imaging system in a tertiary military medical center[ J]. Cancer, 2009,117 (4) :264 -70.
  • 9Papillo J L, St John T L, Leiman G. Effectiveness of the ThinPrep imaging system:clinical experience in a low risk screening popula- tion[J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2008,36(3) :155 -60.
  • 10Halford J A, Batty T, Boost T, et al. Comparison of the sensitivity of conventional cytology and the ThinPrep iamging system for 1 083 biopsy confirmed high-grade squamous Lesions [ J ]. Diagn Cyto- pathol, 2010,38(5) :318 -26.

共引文献8

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部