期刊文献+

论人工生命理论在认知科学范式转换中的作用——从“涉身-嵌入”到“涉身-情境” 被引量:2

The Role of AL Theory in the Ongoing Paradigm Shift Within the Cognitive Science——From Embodied Embedded to Embodied Situated Cognitive Science
原文传递
导出
摘要 人工智能的发展使正统的认知科学转向"涉身-嵌入"的研究范式。然而,"涉身-嵌入"的人工智能也有自身的局限。人工自主体特定的涉身性使它的自治系统的实现缺乏生命系统特有的"自创生",从而无法以复杂生物体的方式行动。解决这个问题需要人工生命的理论,这也使得认知科学的研究从"涉身-嵌入"转向"涉身-情境"的范式。 AI can have a significant impact on the ongoing shift from orthodox toward embodied-embedded cognitive science. However,embodied-embedded AI has also started to encounter some of its own limitations. Artificial agents of current embodied-embedded AI cannot behave in the way that more complex living organisms do. AL discoveries have shown that embodied-embedded AI failed because autopoiesis is still missing in the current implementations of autonomous systems,and this shortcoming is likely related to their particular manner of embodiment. So the authors advocate that it is from embodied-embedded toward situated in the ongoing paradigm shift within the cognitive science.
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期7-13,共7页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 国家社科基金重点项目 基于逻辑视域的认知研究(11AZD056)
关键词 认知科学 人工智能 人工生命 范式转换 自创生 cognitive science artificial intelligence artificial life paradigm shift autopoiesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Anderson M L. Embodied Cognition : A Field Guide [ J ]. Ar- tificial Intelligence,2003,149( 1 ) :91 -130.
  • 2Brooks R A. Intelligence without Representation [ J ]. Artifi- cial Intelligence, 1991,47 ( 1 - 3 ) : 139 - 160.
  • 3Boden M A. Mind as Machine:A History of Cognitive Sci- ence,2 vols [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • 4T van Gelder. The Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Sci-ence [ J ]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1998,21 ( 5 ) : 615 - 665.
  • 5Wheeler M. Reconstructing the Cognitive World [ M ]. Cam- bridge : The MIT Press ,2005.
  • 6Dreyfus H L. Being-in-the-World [ M ]. Cambridge : The MIT Press, 1991.
  • 7Brooks R A. From Earwigs to Humans [ J ]. Robotics and Au- tonomous Systems, 1997,20 ( 2 - 4 ) : 291 - 304.
  • 8Dreyfus H L. Why Heideggerian AI Failed and How Fixing it would Require Making it More Heideggerian[ J]. Philosophi- cal Psychology,2007,20 ( 2 ) :247 - 268.
  • 9Ziemke T. What' s Life Got to Do with It? [ M ] // Chella A Manzotti R. Artificial Consciousness: Imprint Academic, 2007:48 - 66.
  • 10Langton C G. Life at the Edge of Chaos [ M ] //Langton C G,Taylor C E, Farmer J D, Rasmussen S. Artificial Life II,SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity:X Addison-Wes- ley, 1991:41 - 49.

同被引文献15

  • 1Neumann, J. V. Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata[M].Urbana: University Illinois Press, 1966.
  • 2Emmeche, C. ‘Is Life a Multiverse Phenomenon?' [A], Langton, C. G.(ed.), Artificial Life Ill[C], Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1994.
  • 3Sober, E. 'Learning from functionalism - Prospects for Strong Artificial Life' [A], Langton, C. G., Taylor, C. E., Farmer, J. D., Rasmussen, S.(eds), Artificial Life//[C], Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1991.
  • 4Langton, C. G. 'Artificial life' [A]. Langton, C. G.(ed.), Artificial Life[C], Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, Addison-Wesley, 1989.
  • 5Taylor, C. E. 'Fleshing Out' [A]. Langton, C. G., Taylor, C. E., Farmer, J. D., Rasmussen, S.(eds), Artificial Life//[C], Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1991.
  • 6Langton, C. G. 'Life at the Edge of Chaos' [A], Langton, C. G., Taylor, C. E., Farmer, J. D., Rasmussen, S.(eds), Artificial Life H[C], Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1991.
  • 7Dupuy, J. P. 'Complexity and Uncertainty. A Prudential Approach' [A], Allhoff, F., Lin, P., Moor, J., Weckert, J.(eds.), Nanoethies: Examining the Social Impact of Nanotechnology [C], Wiley, N J: Hoboken, 2007, 119-131.
  • 8Canguilheim, G. 'Machine and Organism' [A], Crary, J., Kwinter, S.(eds.) Incorporations [C], New York: Zone Books, 1992.
  • 9李将辉、王硕.《更加侧重基础·更加侧重前沿·更加侧重人才-对话国家自然科学基金委员会主任陈宜瑜院士》,《人民政协报》2010年3月7日,第25版.
  • 10徐炳声.《生物分类学中的方法论》,《自然杂志》1986年第2期.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部