期刊文献+

基于符号互动论的建筑形态审美价值研究 被引量:2

Study on the Aesthetic Value of Architecture Form Based on the Symbol Interaction Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建筑的经济价值的实现在于被人使用,而建筑的审美价值的实现在于被人欣赏。当代很多建筑师往往注重了前者而忽视了后者。根据符号互动论,符号是社会人际交往的基础,人们以符号为媒介进行互动。从广义上来讲,符号是指一切被人赋予某种意义的事物。建筑的各个部分和及其组合无疑具有特定的功能和形式,都蕴含着我们的经验与历史,表达着一定的意义,都可以视作建筑符号。建筑符号就是建筑师的语言,是与公众互动的媒介。如何使用建筑符号与公众进行良好的交流互动是建筑的审美价值得以实现的关键。 When a building is used by people, its economic value can be realized, and when a building is appreciated by people, its aesthetic value can be realized. Many contemporary architects tend to focus on the former and neglect the latter. According to symbolic interactionism, symbol is the foundation of social relationships, which is used as the media of interaction. In a broad sense, symbol refers to the things which are endowed with some kind of meaning. Undoubtedly, the various parts of architecture and its combination can be regarded as architectural symbols, which have a specific function and form, and express a certain of meaning. Architectural symbol is the language of the architect, is the medium of interact with the public. How to use the symbols to communicate with the public is the key to realize the architectural aesthetic value.
作者 肖勤 李玲
出处 《中外建筑》 2015年第3期51-53,共3页 Chinese & Overseas Architecture
关键词 符号互动论 符号 情境 互动 建筑形态 审美价值 symbolic interactionism symbol situation interaction architectural form aesthetic value
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1安东尼·吉登斯著 李康译.《社会的构成》[M].三联书店,1998年版..
  • 2特纳,乔纳森,1987年.《社会学理论的结构》,浙江人民出版社.
  • 3罗森堡、莫里斯、特纳、拉尔夫主编,孙非等译,1992年,《社会学观点的社会心理学手册》,南开大学出版社.
  • 4Frank N.Magill,1997,International Encyclopedia of Sociology—Symbolic Interaction,pp.1399—1402.
  • 5谢立中主编,文国锋编译,1999年,《西方社会学名著提要》,江西人民出版社.
  • 6Lieberson, Stanley, Dumais, Susan, 2000, The Instability of Androgynous Names:The Symbolic Maintenance of Gender Boundaries, in American Journal of Sociology, pp. 1284--1287)
  • 7Keller, Heidi, 2000, Human Parent-child Relationships from an Evolutionary Perspective, in American Behavioral Scientist, pp. 957--965.
  • 8A.White, Flona, 2000, Relationship of Family Socialization Processes to Adolescent Moral Thought, in The Journal of Social Psychology, pp. 75--89.
  • 9D.Foster, Mindi,2000, Positive and Negative Responses to Personal Discrimination:Does Coping Make a Difference?in The Journal of Social Psychology,pp.93--103.
  • 10H.Buchen,Irving,2000,A New Role for Teachers and Students,in The futurist,pp.41—33.

共引文献74

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部