期刊文献+

土工试验中有机质含量测定方法对比研究 被引量:6

Comparative Study on Determination of the Content of Organic Matter in Soil Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 土中有机质含量多少,将直接影响土的性质,而不同的测试方法其测定结果会有一定差异。有机质测定方法很多,目前采用较多的是重铬酸钾法和灼失量法。为了探求这两种方法的结果差异及对工程分类及评价的影响,本文对两种方法进行对比试验,探讨了两种方法测试结果间的差异,并得出有机质含量测定灼失量法测得结果高于重铬酸钾法,有机质含量低时(Wu<5%),一般高出数倍不等,同时建议有机质含量Wu在15%以下,特别是10%以下时,采用重铬酸钾容量法。 The content of organic matter is affect the quality of the soil, and the test result vary with thetechnique used. There are many methods to test the organic matter content in the soil, at present , thepotassium chromate method and burning loss method are more popular. In order to study the influenceabout the classification and evaluation of project which use different tset result with different methods.This paper introduced two methods, and made a contrast test about a group of soil which have differentorganic matter content, and researched the difference of the result of the two test methods, At the end,the writer gave a advise about how to choice a method of test the organic matter content in the soil. Wearrival at a conclusion that the test result by burning loss method is higher than the potassium chromatemethod. When the content of organic matter is lower, the result is several times higher. And when thecontent of organic matter is lower is lower than 10%,we suggest to use the potassium chromate method.
出处 《科技通报》 北大核心 2015年第3期112-114,118,共4页 Bulletin of Science and Technology
关键词 有机质含量 对比试验 重铬酸钾法 灼失量法 the content of organic matter contrast test the potassium chromate method burning lossmethod
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1中华人民共和国建设部. JGJ79-2002. J220-2002建筑地基处理技术规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002:151.
  • 2中华人民共和国建设部.GB50021-2001,岩土工程勘察规范(2009年版)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
  • 3中华人民共和国建设部.GB/T50123-1999土工试验方法标准[S].北京:中国技术标准出版社,1999.
  • 4中华人民共和国铁道部. TB10102-2004, J338-2004铁路工程土工试验规程[S].北京:中国铁道出版社,2004:261-265,335-337.
  • 5中华人民共和国交通部.JTGE40-2007公路土工试验规程[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2007.

共引文献53

同被引文献70

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部