摘要
东汉灵帝时期的鸿都门学从未镌刻石经,其门生也没有参与熹平石经的镌刻。古今学者因为没有辨析鸿都门学与太学的不同,出现了将熹平石经乃至正始石经当作"鸿都石经"的误说。石经不仅关涉到经学史的真相,其所镌刻的文字、书体又与书法碑刻等学科相关。这一误说必须纠正,还经学史、书法史以本来面貌。
As there are no such stone inscriptions of Hongdumen during the reign of Emperor Ling of the Eastern Han dynasty by the learners of the Hongdumen,nor are there prudent identifications of the Hongdumen school and official school,the Hongdumen stone inscriptions begin to spread.This paper is aimed at a rectification.
出处
《河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2015年第2期11-15,共5页
Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)