期刊文献+

Commentary on "validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal"

Commentary on "validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal"
原文传递
导出
摘要 Approximately 6% of men who undergo vasectomy for elective male sterilization request vasectomy reversal (VR). VR is more cost-effective than assisted reproduction techniques (ART), with cumulative pregnancy rates at least as high as with ARTJ Microsurgical VR (MVR) is recognized as the gold standard technique with patency rates of 80%-90% and pregnancy rates of approximately 50%.2 However, MVR requires specific microsurgical skills and has a steep learning curve, particularly for microsurgical vaso-epididymostomy. Urologists who are not fellowship-trained in microsurgery often lack the expertise to perform these procedures. Approximately 6% of men who undergo vasectomy for elective male sterilization request vasectomy reversal (VR). VR is more cost-effective than assisted reproduction techniques (ART), with cumulative pregnancy rates at least as high as with ARTJ Microsurgical VR (MVR) is recognized as the gold standard technique with patency rates of 80%-90% and pregnancy rates of approximately 50%.2 However, MVR requires specific microsurgical skills and has a steep learning curve, particularly for microsurgical vaso-epididymostomy. Urologists who are not fellowship-trained in microsurgery often lack the expertise to perform these procedures.
机构地区 Department of Urology
出处 《Asian Journal of Andrology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第2期332-332,共1页 亚洲男性学杂志(英文版)
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部