期刊文献+

社会建构主义与灾害治理:一项自然灾害的社会学研究 被引量:13

Social Construction Approach and Disaster Mitigation:A Sociology Study on Nature Disaster
下载PDF
导出
摘要 社会建构主义为灾害社会学研究提供了重要的"范式转移"及"反省机制",它主要有两个重要面向、六个基本维度和八个基本命题,建构要素包括建构主体、建构规则和建构话语三个维度,建构逻辑包括建构过程、建构表现和建构结果三个维度,前一面向是在论述灾害与社会的互动关系,后一面向则是基本分析框架,由此引发了"离灾"、非结构式减灾、风险治理、媒体责任、"隐性灾民"及不公平结构根源等重要治理启示。这一理论取向具有动态研究、从自然外部拉回社会内部、从悲观受害者向积极行动者转变等理论优势,但同时也存在着完整分析框架缺乏、实证研究困难、互构过程模糊、理论机制与逻辑关系不明、化约为权力与政治运作逻辑及对科技滥用意识形态批判等局限。 Social construction provides us with an important approach and reflection mechanism for disaster,which includes two important study directions,six basic dimension and eight issues for disaster study. Elements of construction includes constructional subject,rules and discourse,which mainly discuses interactive relationship between society and disaster.Logic of construction,the basic analysis frame,includes constructional process,performance and results.Therefore,there appears a series of important approaches for disaster mitigation,such as avoiding disaster,non-constructional mitigation,risk control,media responsibility,recessive victims and reasons for unfair construction. Such approaches possess theoretical advantages,namely dynamic study,from nature to society,from passive victims to active actors. But it also has some disadvantages,for example,lack of completed analysis frame,difficulties in empirical study,ambiguity of interactive construction process,unclear relationship between theoretical mechanism and logic,relationship between rights and politics,abusing science and technology for the purpose of politics.
作者 周利敏
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期24-37,共14页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
基金 广州市哲学社会学科学"十二五"规划课题(13Y16) 国家社会科学基金一般项目(12BSH024)
关键词 灾害 社会建构主义 功能主义 社会脆弱性 灾害社会学 灾害治理 disaster social construction approach functionalist approach social vulnerability disaster of sociology disaster mitigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1张倩.牧民应对气候变化的社会脆弱性——以内蒙古荒漠草原的一个嘎查为例[J].社会学研究,2011(6):171-195. 被引量:66
  • 2周利敏.社会脆弱性:灾害社会学研究的新范式[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2012(4):20-28. 被引量:51
  • 3D. Alexande(1993). Nature Disasters. London: UCL Press.
  • 4M. D. Barnes, et a1(2008). Analysis of Media Agenda Setting during and after Hurricane Katrina: Implications for E mergency Preparedness, Disaster Response, and disaster Policy. American Journal of Public Health, 98(3).
  • 5U. Beck ( 1992). Risk Society .. Toward a New Modernity. London : Sage Publications Ltd.
  • 6R. Bolin ~ L. Stanford (1998). The Northridge Earthquake ~Vulnerability and Disaster. London.. Routledge. 1992.
  • 7M. T. Boykoff ~ M. B. Jules (2007). CLimate Change and Journalistic Norms:A Case-study of US Mass-media Cov- erage. Geoforum, 38 (16).
  • 8N. R. Britton (1986). Developing an Understanding of Disaster. Journal of Sociology, 22 (2).
  • 9F. N. Burkhart ( 1991 ). Media, Emergency Warnings, and Citizen Response. Boulder, CO : Westview Press.
  • 10R. J. Burby (1998). Cooperating with Nature - Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sus- tainable Corn munities. Washington, D. C : Joseph Henry Press.

二级参考文献79

共引文献113

同被引文献298

引证文献13

二级引证文献195

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部