期刊文献+

Direct-fed microbes: A tool for improving the utilization of low quality roughages in ruminants 被引量:7

Direct-fed microbes: A tool for improving the utilization of low quality roughages in ruminants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 For many years, ruminant nutritionists and microbiologists have been interested in manipulating the microbial ecosystem of the rumen to improve production efficiency of different ruminant species. Removal and restriction of antibiotics subtherapeutic uses from ruminant diets has amplified interest in improving nutrient utilization and animal performance and search for more safe alternatives. Some bacterial and fungal microorganisms as a direct-fed microbial(DFM) can be the most suitable solutions. Microorganisms that are commonly used in DFM for ruminants may be classified mainly as lactic acid producing bacteria(LAB), lactic acid utilizing bacteria(LUB), or other microorganism's species like Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Bacillus, Propionibacterium, Megasphaera elsdenii and Prevotellabryantii, in addition to some fungal species of yeast such as Saccharomyces and Aspergillus. A definitive mode of action for bacterial or fungal DFM has not been established; although a variety of mechanisms have been suggested. Bacterial DFM potentially moderate rumen conditions, and improve weight gain and feed efficiency. Fungal DFM may reduce harmful oxygen from the rumen, prevent excess lactate production, increase feed digestibility, and alter rumen fermentation patterns. DFM may also compete with and inhibit the growth of pathogens, immune system modulation, and modulate microbial balance in the gastrointestinal tract. Improved dry matter intake, milk yield, fat corrected milk yield and milk fat content were obtained with DFM administration. However, the response to DFM is not constant; depending on dosages, feeding times and frequencies, and strains of DFM. Nonetheless, recent studies have supported the positive effects of DFM on ruminant performance. For many years, ruminant nutritionists and microbiologists have been interested in manipulating the microbial ecosystem of the rumen to improve production efficiency of different ruminant species. Removal and restriction of antibiotics subtherapeutic uses from ruminant diets has amplified interest in improving nutrient utilization and animal performance and search for more safe alternatives. Some bacterial and fungal microorganisms as a direct-fed microbial(DFM) can be the most suitable solutions. Microorganisms that are commonly used in DFM for ruminants may be classified mainly as lactic acid producing bacteria(LAB), lactic acid utilizing bacteria(LUB), or other microorganism's species like Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Bacillus, Propionibacterium, Megasphaera elsdenii and Prevotellabryantii, in addition to some fungal species of yeast such as Saccharomyces and Aspergillus. A definitive mode of action for bacterial or fungal DFM has not been established; although a variety of mechanisms have been suggested. Bacterial DFM potentially moderate rumen conditions, and improve weight gain and feed efficiency. Fungal DFM may reduce harmful oxygen from the rumen, prevent excess lactate production, increase feed digestibility, and alter rumen fermentation patterns. DFM may also compete with and inhibit the growth of pathogens, immune system modulation, and modulate microbial balance in the gastrointestinal tract. Improved dry matter intake, milk yield, fat corrected milk yield and milk fat content were obtained with DFM administration. However, the response to DFM is not constant; depending on dosages, feeding times and frequencies, and strains of DFM. Nonetheless, recent studies have supported the positive effects of DFM on ruminant performance.
出处 《Journal of Integrative Agriculture》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第3期526-533,共8页 农业科学学报(英文版)
关键词 direct-fed microbial(DFM) mode of action RUMINANTS direct-fed microbial(DFM),mode of action,ruminants
  • 相关文献

参考文献63

  • 1Abu-Tarboush H M, Al-Saiady M Y, Keir El-Din A H. 1996. Evaluation of diet containing lactobacilli on performance, fecal coliform, and lactobacilli of young dairy calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 57, 39-49.
  • 2Adams M C, Luo J, Rayward D, King S, Gibson R, Moghaddam G H. 2008. Selection of a novel direct-fed microbial to enhance weight gain in intensively reared calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 145, 41-52.
  • 3Asian V S, Thamsborg M, Jorgensen R J, Basse A. 1995. Induced acute ruminal acidosis in goats treated with yeast ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and bicarbonate. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 36.65-68.
  • 4Barton M D. 2000. Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human health. Nutrition Research Reviews, 13,279-299.
  • 5Bruce B B, Gilliland S E, Bush L J, Staley T E. 1979. Influence of feeding cells of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the fecal flora of young dairy calves. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, 104, 207-209.
  • 6Carlsson J, Iwami Y, Yamada T. 1983. Hydrogen peroxide excretion by oral streptococci and effect of lactoperoxidase thiocyanate-hydrogen peroxide. Infection and Immunity, 40.70-80.
  • 7Chaucheyras F, Fonty G, Bertin G, Salmon J M, Gouet P. 1995. Effects of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Levucell SC1), a microbial additive for ruminants, on lactate metabolism in vitro. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 42, 927-933.
  • 8Chiquette J, Allison M J, Rasmussen M A. 2008. Prevotellabryantii 25a used as a probiotic in early-lactation dairy cows: Effect on ruminal fermentation characteristics, milk production, and milk composition. Journal of Dairy Science, 91,3536-3543.
  • 9Cotter P D, Hill C, Ross R P. 2005. Bacteriocins: developing innate immunity for food. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3, 777-788.
  • 10Dawson K A, Hopkins D M. 1991. Differential effects of live yeast on the cellulolytic activities of anaerobic ruminal bacteria. Journal of Animal Science, 69(Suppl. 1), 531.

同被引文献78

引证文献7

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部