期刊文献+

论司法权的事权属性及其启示 被引量:2

Analysis on Power Character of Judicial Power and its Inspiration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法概念已经从非法律概念被正规化。司法权的地方事权属性是我国亟待澄清的概念误识。在各国宪法中司法事权的中央性有多重表现,无论其为联邦制抑或单一制均系如此。司法权归属与法官负责机制的确立,法官任职保障的宪法化以及司法预算的统一化与公开化,缺一不可。目前,我国司法事权的中央性表现及保障不足。改革必须在法院、法官、事权各层面统一实现;改革必须客观司法与行政的分离、法官任职保障的系统性以及匹配财力制度的法治化。 The concept of Judicature has been legitimized from a non-legal concept.The local governance attributes of judicial power is a false identification which should be clarified and rectified.There are many expressions on the centrality of judicial power in different constitutions.It is true whether they are federal nations or unitary nations.The attribution of judicial power and the construction of responsibility system of judges,constitutionalization of the judges' job security,and the unification and openness of the judicial budget are all indispensable.In China,the central character of judicial power is not embodied enough and safeguarded strongly.The reform ought to be realized in various fields such as court,judge and power.The central power character of judicial power decides on the separability of judicature and administration,systematicness of judge job security and the legalization of matching financial resource system.
作者 谭波
出处 《山东科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第1期49-54,87,共7页 Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金项目"央地财权事权匹配的宪政保障机制研究"(12CFX021)
关键词 司法权 属性 事权 Judicial Power Character Power
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献21

共引文献53

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部