期刊文献+

经导管主动脉瓣置入术在中国人群二叶式主动脉瓣重度狭窄中的安全性和有效性评估(英文) 被引量:11

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a severe stenotic bicuspid aortic valve in a Chinese population
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评估经导管主动脉瓣置入术在中国人群二叶式主动脉瓣重度狭窄中的安全性和有效性。创新点:首次在中国人群比较经导管主动脉瓣置入术在二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣重度狭窄中的安全性和有效性。方法:选取2013年3月至2014年9月行经导管主动脉瓣置入术的40位主动脉瓣狭窄的患者,分二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣两组,比较基线水平、手术以及随访1月结果的差别。结论:经导管主动脉瓣置入术在中国人群中二叶式主动脉瓣重度狭窄中的应用是安全有效的。 Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with a severe stenotic bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) in a Chinese population. While several groups have reported the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of TAVI for patients with a BAV, worldwide experience of the technique is still limited, especially in China. Methods: From March 2013 to November 2014, high surgical risk or inoperable patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) who had undergone TAVI at our institution were selected for inclusion in our study. Results were compared between a BAV group and a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) group. Results: Forty patients were included in this study, 15 (37.5%) of whom were identified as having a BAV. In the BAV group, the aortic valve area was smaller ((0.47±0.13) vs. (0.59±0.14) cm2), the ascending aortic diameter was larger ((40.4±4.4) vs. (36.4±4.3) mm), and the concomitant aortic regurgitation was lower. No significant differences were found between the groups in the other baseline characteristics. No differences were observed either in the choice of access or valve size. The procedural success achieved in this study was 100%. There were no differences between groups in device success (86.7% vs. 88.0%), 30-d mortality (6.7% vs. 8.0%), or 30-d combined end point (13.3% vs. 12.0%). The incidences of new pacemaker implantation, paravalvular regurgitation and other complications, recovery of left ventricle ejection fraction and heart function were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Patients with a severely stenotic BAV can be treated with TAVI, and their condition after treatment should be similar to that of people with a TAV.
出处 《Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B(Biomedicine & Biotechnology)》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第3期208-214,共7页 浙江大学学报(英文版)B辑(生物医学与生物技术)
基金 supported by the Fundamental Research Funds from Zhejiang University(No.2012FZA7008),China
关键词 主动脉瓣狭窄 二叶式主动脉瓣 经导管主动脉瓣置入术 Aortic valve stenosis, Bicuspid aortic valve, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Adams, D.H., Popma, J.J., Reardon, M.J., 2014. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N. Engl. J. Med., 371(10):967-968. [doi:10.1056/NEJMc 1408396].
  • 2Bauer, T., Linke, A., Sievert, H., et al., 2014. Comparison of the effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implanta- tion in patients with stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves (from the German TAVI Registry). Am. J. Cardiol., 113(3):518-521. [doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2013. 10.023].
  • 3Costopoulos, C., Latib, A., Maisano, F., et al., 2014. Com- parison of results of transcatheter aortic valve implanta- tion in patients with severely stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid or nonbicuspid valves. Am. J. CardioL, 113(8): 1390-1393. [doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.01.412].
  • 4Erbel, R., Aboyans, V., Boileau, C., et al., 2014. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic dis- eases: document covering acute and chronic aortic dis- eases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J., 35(41):2873-2926. [doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ ehu281].
  • 5Hayashida, K., Bouvier, E., Lef'evre, T., et al., 2013. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Circ. Cardiovasc. In- terv., 6(3):284-291. [doi:10.1161/CIRC/NTERVENTIONS. 112.000084].
  • 6Himbert, D., Pontnau, F., Messika-Zeitoun, D., et aL, 2012. Feasibility and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valves. Am. J. Cardiol., 110(6):877-883. [doi:10. 1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.064].
  • 7Kochman, J., Huczek, Z., Scislo, P., et al., 2014. Comparison of one- and 12-month outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severely stenotic bi- cuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves (results from a mul- ticenter registry). Am. J. Cardiol., 114(5):757-762. [doi: l 0.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.063].
  • 8Leon, M.B., Smi, C.R., Mack, M., et al., 2010. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N. Engl. J. Med., 363(17): 1597-1607. [doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232].
  • 9Leon, M.B., Piazza, N., Nikolsky, E., et al., 2011. Standard- ized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research Consortium. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 57(3):253-269. [doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.005].
  • 10Nistri, S., Basso, C., Marzari, C., et al., 2005. Frequency of bicuspid aortic valve in young male conscripts by echo- cardiogram. Am. J. Cardiol., 96(5):718-721. [doi:10.1016/j amjcard.2005.04.051].

同被引文献29

引证文献11

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部