期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

外显态度对任务中个体心智游移的影响——以四、五年级学生为例

A study on how the explicit attitudes undermine children's introspection of mind wandering
下载PDF
导出
摘要 前人的研究主要关注成人的MW,鲜有针对儿童MW的研究,且研究从未考虑社会因素对于个体MW行为的影响,对MW的主观判断标准的个体差异也未给予足够的重视。本研究以四、五年级的儿童作为被试,让他们完成一个改编的SART(Sustained Attention to Response Task)任务,并在任务结束后填写一份态度问卷,以探讨持不同外显态度的儿童在任务中心智游移的频率差异,以及他们对于心智游移的主观判断标准差异。研究根据问卷的得分将被试分为积极态度组和消极态度组,结果发现:(1)积极态度组的儿童在任务中的心智游移频率显著高于消极态度组的儿童;(2)积极态度组的儿童无法准确地判断当前自己是否正在发生心智游移。 Previous studies mainly concentrated on mind wandering of adult, but little is known about the MW experience of children, and no social psychological factors has been taken into account. In addition, previous studies hasn＇t attach any importance to the validity of participant＇s introspection. In the current study, one hundred three primary students in grades 4 or 5 （mean age = 10.6 years） were recruited as subjects. The MW experiences were probed during the adapted Sustained Attention to Response Task （SART）, and their attitudes towards MW were measured by questionnaire. Results showed that （1） children with positive attitudes reported more MW during the SART than children with negative attitudes; and （2） children with positive attitudes provided invalid reports of MW.
作者 张翼
机构地区 浙江师范大学
出处 《九江职业技术学院学报》 2015年第1期74-77,64,共5页 Journal of Jiujiang Vocational and Technical College
关键词 心智游移 外显态度 儿童SART任务 mind-wandering SART TUT attitudes
分类号 B842.6 [哲学宗教—基础心理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1胡楠荼,许百华.心智游移的研究:理论、方法及进展[J].应用心理学,2012,18(1):40-49. 被引量：13
  • 2Jackson, J. D., Balota, D. A. (2012). Mind- wandering in younger and older adults: converging evidence from the Sustained Attention to Response Task and reading for com- prehension. Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural. Psy- chol Aging, 27(I), 106-119. doi: 10. I037/a0023933.
  • 3Smallwood, J., Fitzgerald, A., Miles, L. K., & Phillips, L. H. (2009). Shifting moods, wandering minds: negative moods lead the mind to wander. [Con- trolled Clinical Trial]. Emotion, 9(2), 271- 276. doi: 10.1037/a0014855.
  • 4Feng, S., D' Mello, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2013). Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts. Re- search Support, U.S. Gov' t, Non - P. H.S. Psychon Bull Rev, 20(3), 586 - 592. doi: 10. 3758/s13423 - 012 - 0367 - y.
  • 5Smallwood, J., O'Connor, R. C., Sudbery, M. V., & Obonsawin, M. (2007). Mind- wandering and dysphoria. Cognition and Emotion, 21(4), 816- 842. doi: 10.1080/ 02699930600911531.
  • 6Smallwood, J., Nind, L., & O'Connor, R. C. (2009). When is your head at? An exploration of the factors associ- ated with the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Re- search Support, Non- IJ. S. Gov't. Conscious Cogn, 18 (1), 118- 125. doi: 10. 1016/j.concog.2008.11.004.
  • 7Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. An- num Review of Psychology, 52, 27 - 58. doi: 10. l146/an- nurev, psych. 52.1.27.
  • 8Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Maj, M., Van der Lin- den, M., & D'Argembeau, A. Mind-wandering: phe- nomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method. Acta Psychol (Amst), 136 (3), 370 - 381. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.002.
  • 9Allan Cheyne, J., Solman, G. J., Carriere, J. S., & Smilek, D. Anatomy of an error: a bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention- related errors. Cognition, 111(1), 98-113. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2008.12.009.
  • 10Hu, N., He, S., & Xu, B. Different efficiencies of at- tentional orienting in different wandering minds. Research Support, Non - U.S. Gov' t. Conscious Cogn, 21 (1), 139 - 148. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.007.

二级参考文献56

  • 1Antrobus, J. S., Singer, J. L., & Greenberg, S. ( 1966). Studies in the stream of consciousness: Ex- perimental suppression of spontaneous cognitive pro- cesses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23 ( 2 ), 399 - 417.
  • 2Baars, B. J. ( 1988 ). A cognitive theory of conscious- ness. Cambridge, England : Cambridge University PI"-SS.
  • 3Bargh,J.A. ( 1997). The automatieity of everyday life. In R. S. W. Jr. ( Ed. ), The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1 61 ) . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaurn Associates.
  • 4Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgo- wan,P. S. 17. , Rao, S. M. , & Cox, R. W. (1999).
  • 5Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 ( 1 ), 80 - 93.
  • 6Braboszcz, C., & Delorme, A. (2010). Lost in thoughts: Neural markers of low alertness during mind wandering. Neuroimage, 54(4), 3040 - 3047.
  • 7Buckner, R. L. , Andrews- Hanna, J. R. , & Schacter, D. L. ( 2008). The brain' s default network : Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. New York Acade- my Sciences Annals, 1124, 1 - 38.
  • 8Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. ( 2007 ). Self-projec- tion and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2),49 - 57.
  • 9Buckner, R. L. , & Vincent, J. L. (2007). Unrest at rest: Default activity and spontaneous network corre- lations. Neuroimage, 37(4), 1091 - 1096.
  • 10Christoff, K. , Gordon, A. M. , Smallwood, J., Smith, R. , & Schooler, J. W. ( 2009). Experience sampling during fMRI 1"eveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(21 ), 8719 - 8724.

共引文献12

九江职业技术学院学报
2015年 第1期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部