摘要
目的:对比单独使用中药灌肠与物理理疗及联合使用对复发性盆腔炎(PID)的临床实效性。方法:将RPID患者60例分为单独使用中药灌汤治疗的A组和单独使用物理理疗治疗的B组,以及联合两种方法治疗的C组。对3组患者治疗前后中医证候积分,PID评分以及临床疗效进行比较。结果 3个疗程后,C组的中医证候积分,PID评分显著低于治疗前(P<0.01)。C组有效率高于A、B两组(P<0.01)。结论:采用中药灌肠联合物理理疗治疗能有效改善复发性盆腔炎患者的体征、PID的病情状况和临床治疗实效性,联合治疗的效果优于单独治疗,值得在临床中推广。
Objective: To observe and explore the effect of the enema and physical therapy used alone and in combination with in patients with recurrent pelvic inflammatory disease. Methods: 60 cases were divided into separate treatment using traditional Chinese medicine clyster of A group and individual physical therapy treatment of group B,and the two methods combined therapy of group C. Three groups of patients were compared with TCM symptom scores,PID examination scores and clinical efficacy before and after treatment. Results: After the treatment of the three courses,the symptom scores and PID scores of C group were lower than those before the treatment(P〈0. 01). Therapy effective rate of C group was higher than group A and group B(P〈0. 01).Conclusion: Use of Chinese medicine enema combined with physical therapy treatment can improve symptoms in patients with recurrent PID status and the effectiveness of clinical treatment,combination therapy is better than monotherapy,worthy of promotion in clinical.
出处
《辽宁中医杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2015年第3期549-550,共2页
Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
复发性盆腔炎
中药灌肠
物理理疗
联合用药
Recurrent pelvic inflammatory disease
Enema
Physical therapy
Combination therapy