期刊文献+

Moral Psychology of Shame in Early Confucian Philosophy

Moral Psychology of Shame in Early Confucian Philosophy
原文传递
导出
摘要 In Westem philosophy and psychology, shame is characterized as a self-critical emotion that is often contrasted with the similarly self-critical but morally active emotion of guilt. If shame is negative concern over endangered or threatened self-image (usually in front of others), guilt is autonomous moral awareness of one's wrongdoings and reparative motivation to correct one's moral misconduct. Recently, many psychologists have begun to discuss the moral significance of shame in their comparative studies of non-Western cultures. In this new approach, shame is characterized as a positive moral emotion and active motivation for self-reflection and self-cultivation. If shame is a positive and active moral emotion, what is its moral psychological nature? In this paper, I will analyze shame from the perspective of cultural psychology and early Confucian philosophy. Unlike many Western philosophers, Confucius and Mencius discuss shame as a form of moral excellence. In early Confucian texts, shame is not a reactive emotion of an endangered self but a moral disposition that supports a self-critical and self-transformative process of moral development. In Westem philosophy and psychology, shame is characterized as a self-critical emotion that is often contrasted with the similarly self-critical but morally active emotion of guilt. If shame is negative concern over endangered or threatened self-image (usually in front of others), guilt is autonomous moral awareness of one's wrongdoings and reparative motivation to correct one's moral misconduct. Recently, many psychologists have begun to discuss the moral significance of shame in their comparative studies of non-Western cultures. In this new approach, shame is characterized as a positive moral emotion and active motivation for self-reflection and self-cultivation. If shame is a positive and active moral emotion, what is its moral psychological nature? In this paper, I will analyze shame from the perspective of cultural psychology and early Confucian philosophy. Unlike many Western philosophers, Confucius and Mencius discuss shame as a form of moral excellence. In early Confucian texts, shame is not a reactive emotion of an endangered self but a moral disposition that supports a self-critical and self-transformative process of moral development.
作者 Bongrae Seok
出处 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》 2015年第1期21-57,共37页 中国哲学前沿(英文版)
关键词 SHAME VIRTUE cultural psychology moral psychology earlyconfucian philosophy markedness theory attribution theory shame, virtue, cultural psychology, moral psychology, earlyconfucian philosophy, markedness theory, attribution theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献116

  • 1Andersen, Henning. 1989. "Markedness-The First 150 Years," in Markedness in Synchrony andDiachrony, edited by Olga Mieska Tomi6, 11-46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 2Aristotle. 1985. Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, translated by T. Irwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
  • 3Aristotle. 2011. Eudemian Ethics, translated by A. Kenny. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • 4Bagozzi, Richard E, Willem Verbeke, and Jr. Jacinto C. Gavino. 2003. "Culture Moderates the Self-Regulation of Shame and Its Effects on Performance: The Case of Salespersons in the Netherlands, and the Philippines." Journal of Applied Psychology 88:219-33.
  • 5Barkan, Elazar. 2000. The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. New York, NY: Norton.
  • 6Babcock, Mary K., and John Sabini, J. 1990. "On Differing Embarrassment from Shame." European Journal of Social Psychology 20:151-69.
  • 7Battistella, Edwin. 1990. Markedness. The Evaluative Superstructure of Language. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • 8Bedford, Olwen A. 2004. "The Individual Experience of Guilt and Shame in Chinese Culture." Culture & Psychology 10-1: 29-52.
  • 9Bedford, Olwen A., and Kwang-Kuo Hwang. 2003. "Guilt and Shame in Chinese Culture: A Cross-Cultural Framework from the Perspective of Morality and Identity." Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33: 12744.
  • 10Benedict, Ruth. 1946. The Chrysanthemum and the Sword." Patterns of Japanese Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部