德勒兹式仿像:真哲人与真智者的柏拉图式二元对待

A Deleuzian Simulacrum:The Platonian Dualism Between a Genuine Philosopher and a Genuine Sophist

本文对柏拉图真哲人与真智者的二元对待进行德勒兹式阐释。柏拉图以真理为根基评判对真理知识的种种宣称。真哲人居于宣称者等级的顶端而智者被示为作伪。真哲人以绝对真理为知识模型,由于对真理的分有度最高,其知识为绝对真理的优秀摹本;而智者仅为他的模型真哲人的仿像,其对相对真理知识的宣称因此被指斥为没有根基,为仿像。德勒兹则恢复智者差异的权利,赋予仿像永久、切近、临在的在场地位。柏拉图式二元对待也就此被揭示为德勒兹式仿像。

This paper attempts to interpret the Platonian dualism between genuine philosopher and genuine sophist in a Deleuzian fashion.Plato establishes truth as the ground on which to measure the claims to knowledge of truth,with the genuine philosopher topping the hierarchy of claimants and the sophist represented as a false claimant.While the genuine philosopher models his knowledge of absolute truth exactly after absolute truth and,as a result of the greatest possible degree of his participation,his knowledge is a good copy of absolute truth,the sophist is merely a simulacrum of his model,the genuine philosopher,and his claim to knowledge of relative truth is therefore denounced as groundless,as simulacral.Deleuze,by contrast,restores the sophist＇s right to difference and affords the simulacrum a status of eternal,immediate,and immanent presence.The Platonian dualism is thereby revealed to be a Deleuzian simulacrum.