期刊文献+

Quality monitoring in colonoscopy: Time to act 被引量:3

Quality monitoring in colonoscopy: Time to act
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Colonoscopy is the gold standard test for colorectal cancer screening. The primary advantage of colonoscopy as opposed to other screening modalities is the ability to provide therapy by removal of precancerous lesions at the time of detection. However, colonoscopy may miss clinically important neoplastic polyps. The value of colonoscopy in reducing incidence of colorectal cancer is dependent on many factors including, the patient, provider, and facility level. A high quality examination includes adequate bowel preparation, optimal colonoscopy technique, meticulous inspection during withdrawal, identification of subtle flat lesions, and complete polypectomy. Considerable variation among institutions and endoscopists has been reported in the literature. In attempt to diminish this disparity, various approaches have been advocated to improve the quality of colonoscopy. The overall impact of these interventions is not yet well defined. Implementing optimal education and training and subsequently analyzing the impact of these endeavors in improvement of quality will be essential to augment the utility of colonoscopy for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy is the gold standard test for colorectalcancer screening. The primary advantage of colonoscopyas opposed to other screening modalities is the abilityto provide therapy by removal of precancerous lesionsat the time of detection. However, colonoscopy maymiss clinically important neoplastic polyps. The value ofcolonoscopy in reducing incidence of colorectal canceris dependent on many factors including, the patient,provider, and facility level. A high quality examinationincludes adequate bowel preparation, optimal colonoscopytechnique, meticulous inspection duringwithdrawal, identification of subtle flat lesions, andcomplete polypectomy. Considerable variation amonginstitutions and endoscopists has been reported in theliterature. In attempt to diminish this disparity, variousapproaches have been advocated to improve the qualityof colonoscopy. The overall impact of these interventionsis not yet well defined. Implementing optimal educationand training and subsequently analyzing the impactof these endeavors in improvement of quality will beessential to augment the utility of colonoscopy for theprevention of colorectal cancer.
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy》 CAS 2015年第4期328-335,共8页 世界胃肠内镜杂志(英文版)(电子版)
关键词 COLONOSCOPY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT Cecalintubation RATE ADENOMA detection RATE Colonoscopy Quality improvement Cecal intubation rate Adenoma detection rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献71

  • 1Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health carequality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health CareQuality. JAMA 1998; 280: 1000-1005 [PMID: 9749483].
  • 2Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21stCentury. Washington (DC), 2001.
  • 3Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, Nadel MR, Manninen DL,Given LS, Dong FB, Winges LD, McKenna MT. How manyendoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening- Resultsfrom CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology 2004;127: 1670-1677 [PMID: 15578503].
  • 4Rex DK, Johnson DA, Lieberman DA, Burt RW, Sonnenberg A.Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations ofthe American College of Gastroenterology. American College ofGastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 868-877 [PMID:10763931 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02059.x].
  • 5Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, vanBallegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, PanishJF, Stewart ET, Waye JD. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-termprevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:687-696 [PMID: 22356322 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370].
  • 6Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M,Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M,Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and therisk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-1803 [PMID:20463339 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667].
  • 7Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, Rothwell DM, Vinden C,Rabeneck L. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers aftercolonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis.Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 96-102 [PMID: 17241863 DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.027].
  • 8Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, Bernstein CN. Rate and predictorsof early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: apopulation-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2588-2596[PMID: 20877348 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.390].
  • 9Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE,Hoffman B, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Petersen BT, Safdi MA,Faigel DO, Pike IM. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am JGastroenterol 2006; 101: 873-885 [PMID: 16635231 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00673.x].
  • 10Rex DK. Avoiding and defending malpractice suits forpostcolonoscopy cancer: advice from an expert witness. ClinGastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 768-773 [PMID: 23376796 DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.01.027].

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部