期刊文献+

Assessment of clinical and radiological response to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients 被引量:2

Assessment of clinical and radiological response to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Sorafenib is an effective anti-angiogenic treatment forhepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). The assessment of tumor progression in patients treated with sorafenib is crucial to help identify potentially-resistant patients,avoiding unnecessary toxicities. Traditional methods to assess tumor progression are based on variations in tumor size and provide unreliable results in patients treated with sorafenib. New methods to assess tumor progression such as the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or European Association for the Study of Liver criteria are based on imaging to measure the vascularization and tumor volume(viable or necrotic). These however fail especially when the tumor response results in irregular development of necrotic tissue. Newer assessment techniques focus on the evaluation of tumor volume,density or perfusion. Perfusion computed tomography and Dynamic ContrastEnhanced-UltraS ound can measure the vascularization of HCC lesions and help predict tumor response to antiangiogenic therapies. Mean Transit Time is a possible predictive biomarker to measure tumor response. Volumetric techniques are reliable,reproducible and time-efficient and can help measure minimal changes in viable tumor or necrotic tissue,allowing the prompt identification of non-responders. Volume ratio may be a reproducible biomarker for tumor response. Larger trials are needed to confirm the use of these techniques in the prediction of response to sorafenib. Sorafenib is an effective anti-angiogenic treatment forhepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The assessment oftumor progression in patients treated with sorafenibis crucial to help identify potentially-resistant patients,avoiding unnecessary toxicities. Traditional methodsto assess tumor progression are based on variationsin tumor size and provide unreliable results in patientstreated with sorafenib. New methods to assess tumorprogression such as the modified Response EvaluationCriteria in Solid Tumors or European Association forthe Study of Liver criteria are based on imaging tomeasure the vascularization and tumor volume (viableor necrotic). These however fail especially when thetumor response results in irregular development ofnecrotic tissue. Newer assessment techniques focus onthe evaluation of tumor volume, density or perfusion.Perfusion computed tomography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-UltraSound can measure the vascularizationof HCC lesions and help predict tumor response to antiangiogenictherapies. Mean Transit Time is a possiblepredictive biomarker to measure tumor response.Volumetric techniques are reliable, reproducible andtime-efficient and can help measure minimal changesin viable tumor or necrotic tissue, allowing the promptidentification of non-responders. Volume ratio may be areproducible biomarker for tumor response. Larger trialsare needed to confirm the use of these techniques in theprediction of response to sorafenib.
出处 《World Journal of Hepatology》 CAS 2015年第1期33-39,共7页 世界肝病学杂志(英文版)(电子版)
关键词 Hepatocellular carcinoma SORAFENIB ResponseEvaluation Criteria in Solid TUMORS Perfusioncomputed tomography Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-UltraSound VOLUMETRIC ASSESSMENT Hepatocellular carcinoma Sorafenib Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Perfusion computed tomography Dynamic Contrast-EnhancedUltraS ound Volumetric assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1Crissien AM, Frenette C. Current management of hepatocellularcarcinoma. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2014; 10:153-161 [PMID: 24829542].
  • 2Bruera G, Cannita K, Giordano AV, Manetta R, VicentiniR, Carducci S, Saltarelli P, Iapadre N, Coletti G, Ficorella C,Ricevuto E. Multidisciplinary management of hepatocellularcarcinoma in clinical practice. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014:806391 [PMID: 24900987 DOI: 10.1155/2014/806391].
  • 3Liccioni A, Reig M, Bruix J. Treatment of hepatocellularcarcinoma. Dig Dis 2014; 32: 554-563 [PMID: 25034288 DOI:10.1159/000360501].
  • 4Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, BlancJF, de Oliveira AC, Santoro A, Raoul JL, Forner A, SchwartzM, Porta C, Zeuzem S, Bolondi L, Greten TF, Galle PR, SeitzJF, Borbath I, H-ussinger D, Giannaris T, Shan M, MoscoviciM, Voliotis D, Bruix J. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellularcarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 378-390 [PMID: 18650514DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708857].
  • 5Messerini L, Novelli L, Comin CE. Microvessel density andclinicopathological characteristics in hepatitis C virus andhepatitis B virus related hepatocellular carcinoma. J ClinPathol 2004; 57: 867-871 [PMID: 15280410 DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2003.015784].
  • 6Chen MY, Bechtold RE, Savage PD. Cystic changes inhepatic metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs) treated with Gleevec (imatinib mesylate). AJR AmJ Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1059-1062 [PMID: 12239065 DOI:10.2214/ajr.179.4.1791059].
  • 7Lassau N, Lamuraglia M, Leclère J, Rouffiac V. [Functionaland early evaluation of treatments in oncology: interest ofultrasonographic contrast agents]. J Radiol 2004; 85: 704-712[PMID: 15238871 DOI: 10.1016/S0221-0363(04)97651-2].
  • 8Kim HY, Park JW. Clinical trials of combined moleculartargeted therapy and locoregional therapy in hepatocellularcarcinoma: past, present, and future. Liver Cancer 2014; 3: 9-17[PMID: 24804173 DOI: 10.1159/000343854].
  • 9Zheng J, Shao G, Luo J. Analysis of survival factors in patientswith intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treatedwith transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combinedwith sorafenib. Clin Transl Oncol 2014; 16: 1012-1017 [PMID:24894839 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-014-1189-3].
  • 10Sacco R, Gadaleta-Caldarola G, Galati G, Lombardi G, MazzaG, Cabibbo G. EASL HCC summit: liver cancer management.Future Oncol 2014; 10: 1129-1132 [PMID: 24947253 DOI:10.2217/fon.14.68].

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部