期刊文献+

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FROM A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE DOES THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE HELP PROMOTE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY?

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FROM A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE DOES THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE HELP PROMOTE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY?
原文传递
导出
摘要 The business judgment rule (B JR) is a U.S. corporate law concept that has gained international recognition. It has been moulded, particularly in the definition of the Delaware courts, to protect the managerial business discretion, in other words to protect directors" decisions from judicial review. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) questions the relationship between corporation with a business purpose and society. More and more attention is drawn to the various impacts of corporate decisions on society, asking for the necessity for directors to take these impacts into consideration when making business decisions. At the centre of CSR and the BJR are the fiduciary duties of the directors --the duty of diligence and the duty of care --and the question as to if the directors have breached their duties and if they have fulfilled them in a CSR compatible manner. This paper discusses how the B JR helps promoting CSR by discussing the advantages and disadvantages (real or apparenO of the B JR with respect to CSR. The business judgment rule (B JR) is a U.S. corporate law concept that has gained international recognition. It has been moulded, particularly in the definition of the Delaware courts, to protect the managerial business discretion, in other words to protect directors" decisions from judicial review. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) questions the relationship between corporation with a business purpose and society. More and more attention is drawn to the various impacts of corporate decisions on society, asking for the necessity for directors to take these impacts into consideration when making business decisions. At the centre of CSR and the BJR are the fiduciary duties of the directors --the duty of diligence and the duty of care --and the question as to if the directors have breached their duties and if they have fulfilled them in a CSR compatible manner. This paper discusses how the B JR helps promoting CSR by discussing the advantages and disadvantages (real or apparenO of the B JR with respect to CSR.
出处 《Frontiers of Law in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities》 2015年第1期8-23,共16页 中国高等学校学术文摘·法学(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献76

  • 1The term of corporate responsibility (CR) is currently preferred by corporations.
  • 2E. Elhauge, Sacrificing Corporate Profits in the Public Interest, 80 New York Law Review 734 (2005).
  • 3J. E. Kerr, Sustainability Meets Profitability: The Convenient Truth of How the Business Judgment Rule Protects a Board's Decision to Engage in Social Entrepreneurship, 29 Cardozo Law Review 623, 624 (2007).
  • 4Robert Spmgue & Arron J. Lyttle, Shareholderprimacy and the Business Judgment Rule: Arguments for Expanded Corporate Democracy, 16 Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance 1, (2011).
  • 5The ALI's formulation is a prudential regulation, which may or not be adopted by a federal legislature or by a court.
  • 6Aroson vs Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 812 (Del. 1984);.
  • 7Kaplan vs Centex Corp., 284 A.2d 119, 124 (Del. 1971).
  • 8Robinson vs Pittsburgh OilRefinery Corp., 126 A. 46 (Del. 1924).
  • 9Grobow vs Perot, 539 A. 2d 180 (Del. 1988).
  • 10WENG Xiaochuan, Assessing the Applicability of the Business Judgment Rule and the "Defensive" Business Judgment Rule in the Chinese Judiciary: A Perspective on Takeover Dispute Adjudication, 34 Fordham International Law Journal 124, 129 (2011).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部