期刊文献+

现代伦理意义下的“阴阳”概念再认识 被引量:2

Updating Yin and Yang
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近来,伦理学家们还未能更多地关注中国阴阳互补,这需要重新考虑阴阳互补并进而使之成为当前伦理学思考的基础所在。笔者在《从启蒙到感受性》一书中,讨论了西方过分强调理性控制和自主性,而以牺牲感受性价值为代价的问题。阴阳互补已经预示与廓清了近年来西方哲学思想所呈现出来的重视感受性和理性控制间互补的发展趋势。但是正像西方哲学过于强调理性自主一样,中国思想还没有完全领会理性自主的重要性,中西方思想都需要寻找一种自主控制和感受性之间的平衡。不过我们认为这样一个平衡观念更多地来自中国阴阳而不是以往西方哲学的其它概念。 Ethicists haven't paid much attention recently to the Chinese complementarity of yin and yang.That complementarity can be updated to take into account and also from the basis for some of our contemporary ethical thinking.In my From Enlightenment to Receptivity,I argue that Western thought has overemphasized rational control/autonomy at the expense of the countervailing virtue of receptivity,and it turns out that the yin/yang complementarity can be profitably viewed as anticipating and clarifying a complementarity between receptivity and rational control that recent developments in Western philosophical thought point us toward.But just as Western philosophy has overemphasized rational autonomy,Chinese thinking hasn't sufficiently appreciated its importance.Both Chinese and Western thought need to seek a more even balance between autonomy/control and receptivity,but the idea of such balance comes more from anything in previous Western philosophy.
出处 《齐鲁学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期75-81,共7页 Qilu Journal
基金 山东省教育厅优秀中青年骨干教师国际合作培养计划项目资助
关键词 阴阳 感受性 理性控制 自主性 互补性 Yin and Yang receptivity rational control autonomywestern thought Chinese thought
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1[美] Solte, Michael. From Enlightenment to Recep- tivity: Rethinking Our Values [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • 2[美] Nussbaum, Martha. Sex and Social Justice [-M].New York: Oxford University Press,1999.

同被引文献7

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部