期刊文献+

椎板间入路椎间孔镜下摘除L5/S1椎间盘突出髓核技术改进探讨 被引量:17

Technical improvement of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for l5/s1 disc herniation via interlaminar approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨椎间孔镜经椎板间隙摘除腰5骶1椎间盘突出髓核手术操作技巧。方法 2012年1月-2013年7月,我科对30例高髂嵴腰5骶1椎间盘突出症患者,实施了经椎板间隙入路椎间孔镜下摘除突出髓核手术。结果术毕下肢麻木减轻5例,麻木无改善4例,麻木加重1例。无感染及硬膜囊撕裂等并发症。平均随访6.8个月,所有下肢麻木病例均恢复正常。术前术后腰腿痛VAS评分差异有显著性(P<0.05)。术后3个月Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)疗效评分较术前显著改善(P<0.05)。结论腰5骶1椎间盘突出症伴高髂嵴患者的微创手术,椎板间入路经皮内镜术是较好的选择,但是其狭小操作空间、增强安全性、适应证窄极具挑战性。 【Objective】To investigate operative skills of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5/S1 disc herniation via interlaminar approach. 【Methods】From January 2012 to July 2013, 30 patients with L5/S1 disc herniation were underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via interlaminar approach. 【Results】At the end of surgery leg numbness improved in 8 cases, no improved in 4 cases, sharpen in one case. No infection and dural injuries were occurred in all cases. Average follow-up was 6.8 months, all leg numbness disappeared. The preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale(VAS) were used to evaluate the back pain and the leg pain(P〈0.05). According to Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) for the functional status, the results of ODI demonstrated improvement post-surgery 3 months compared with pre-surgery(P〈0.05). 【Conclusion】Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5/S1 disc herniation with high iliac crest via interlaminar approach was a better choice. But its security, small operational space and narrow indications were challenged.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 北大核心 2015年第3期326-329,共4页 China Journal of Endoscopy
基金 深圳市科技计划基金项目(No:201202194)
关键词 腰椎间盘突出 内镜 微创手术 椎板间隙入路 lumbar disc herniation endoscopy minimally invasive surgery interlaminar approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献111

共引文献849

同被引文献123

  • 1罗曼,耿立成.椎间孔镜手术硬膜外麻醉和局部麻醉的效果对比[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,0(99):219-220. 被引量:1
  • 2汲长蛟,宫良泰,张寿涛.体重指数与腰椎间盘突出症发病的相关性临床研究[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2007,45(5):520-523. 被引量:13
  • 3赵辉,倪才方,唐天驷.腰椎间盘突出症微创治疗进展[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(7):641-642. 被引量:33
  • 4Hsieh AH, Twomey JD. Cellular mechanobiology of the intervertebral disc: new directions and approachesIJ]. J Biomech, 2010, 43( 1 ): 137 - 145.
  • 5An HS, Masuda K, Inoue N. Intervertebral disc degeneration: bio- logical and biomechanical factors[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2006,11 (5) : 541 - 552.
  • 6TENENBAUM S, ARZI H, HERMAN A, et al. Percutaneous posterolateral transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: clinical outcome, complication, and learning curve evaluation[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2011, 17(21): 278-283.
  • 7LEE S, KIM S K, LEE S H, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation: classification of disc migration and surgical approaches[J]. Eur Spine J, 2007, 16(3): 431-437.
  • 8YEUNG A T, TSOU P M. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: Surgicaltechnique,outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2002, 27(7): 722-731.
  • 9HOOGLAND T, SCHUBERT M, MIKLITZ B, et al. Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(24): E890-E897.
  • 10Kamper S J,Ostelo R W,Rubinstein S M,et al.Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Eur Spine J,2014,23(5):1021-1043.

引证文献17

二级引证文献188

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部